Abstract
It is customary for those who draw attention to the Russian threat and who seek a Europeanist defence option to argue that the Soviets are aggressive and intend to rule the world and that this can be proved by looking at Soviet ideology, military strategy, military capabilities and foreign policy. They argue that the Russian attitude to war is very different from Western attitude; theirs is shaped by an ideology that stresses the role of violence as a midwife of progress. One of the precepts of Soviet Communism is that the class struggle will lead to an inevitable conflict between the exploiters and exploited which will bring about the establishment of communism.1 At the international level, this struggle is seen through the division of the world into an imperialist camp and a socialist camp locked into a fight to the finish.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 28 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1964) p. 3.
Guido Vigeveno, The Bomb and the Security of Europe (London: C. Hurst & Co., 1983).
Gordon Craig, Europe Since 1945 (New York: 1966).
Lt Col. Ye Rybkin, ‘On The Nature of a Nuclear Missile War’ in W. R. Kintner & H. F. Scot, The Nuclear Revolution In Soviet Military Affairs (University of Oklahoma Press, 1968) p. 109.
Dimitri Simes, ‘Deterrence and Coercion In Soviet Policy’, International Security, vol. 5. no. 3. 1981, p. 88.
Colin S. Gray and Keith Payne, ‘Victory is Possible’, Foreign Policy, Summer 1980, no. 39, pp. 14–28.
Konrad EGE et Martha Wenger, La Nouvelle Doctrine ‘“Airland Battle”: Ce Que Serait Une Guerre en Europe,’ Le Monde Diplomatique, Feb. 1983, pp. 12–13.
Franklin D. Holzman, ‘Are the Soviet Really Outspending the U.S. on Defence’?, International Security vol. 4., no. 4, Spring 1980, p. 86ff.
Konrad EGE, ‘L’Effort de Rearmement Aux Etata Unis: Budget de Defence ou Budget de Guerre’?, Le Monde Diplomatique 1983, p. 6.
Douglas T. Stuart, ‘Prospects for Sino-European Security Cooperation’, Orbis, vol. 26, Autumn 1982, p. 721.
Epstein, Measuring Military Power: the Soviet Air Threat (Princeton University Press, 1984).
Fen Osler Hampson, ‘Groping for Technical Panaceas: The European Conventional Balance and Nuclear Stability’, International Security vol. 8, no. 3, Winter 1983/84, p. 57.
Nino Pasti, ‘Euro-Missiles and the General Balance of NATO and Warsaw Pact Forces’(Helsinki World Peace Council, 1979).
Brodie, US Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Perceptions: Relations between the US and the USSR (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1978) p. 329.
Lawrence Freedman, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. (London: Macmillan, 1981) p. 336.
Sh.P. Sanakoyev and N. I. Kapchenko, Socialism: Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1976) p. 126.
David Holloway. The Soviet Union and the Arms Race (New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1983) pp. 81–2.
Stephen M. Meyer. ‘Soviet Theatre Nuclear Forces, Part 1: Development of Doctrine and Objectives’, Adelphi Papers no. 2, 187 (London: IISS, 1983) p. 4.
D. a. Volkogonov et al. (eds), Voina i Armiya (Moscow: Voenizdat, 1977) p. 354.
Vernon V. Aspaturian, ‘Soviet Global Power and the Correlation of Forces’, Problems of Communism (May-June, 1980) p. 9.
A. Sergiyev, ‘Leninism and the Correlation of Forces as a Factor of International Relations’, International Affairs, May 1975, p. 103.
Copyright information
© 1986 Geoffrey Lee Williams and Alan Lee Williams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, G.L., Williams, A.L. (1986). European Defence: How Real is the Soviet Threat?. In: The European Defence Initiative. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07825-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07825-7_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07827-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07825-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)