Abstract
Authors’ comments about their own work are deservedly suspect. However, one exception to this generalisation is T. S. Eliot. Although his enigmatic language and sometimes unfortunate phrasing have often obscured his intentions, he attempted in numerous ways to direct readers to his aesthetic philosophy and purpose throughout his career. For example, when he said that he was a ‘classicist’, he was pointing to a major aspect of his work in both conception and content; when he praised James Joyce’s ‘mythical method’, he was indirectly speaking about his own classical strategies; and when he wrote about the necessity of borrowing from another author’s work, he was describing and justifying his own allusional system. Yet, although Eliot may indeed be trusted to lead readers toward an understanding of his purpose, the classical dimension of his poetry has been relatively ignored.1 To rectify this critical oversight, this article will examine the extent and substance of Eliot’s classicism, how it relates to his own allusional and ‘mythical method’, and how this classical context adds new meaning to Eliot’s poems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Hazel Barnes, The Meddling Gods, Four Essays on Classical Themes (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1974), for one study which is, by intention, limited to one chapter on Eliot’s drama.
T. S. Eliot, ‘East Coker’, The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909–1950 (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1952) p. 123. Hereafter cited in the text as CPP with page number in parentheses.
For example, Mrs Valerie Eliot, The Waste Land Facsimile (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971), pp. 128–9, noted Eliot’s use of Homer in the original draft of the poem. All extracts from this volume are reprinted with the permission of Mrs Valerie Eliot and Faber & Faber Ltd, London.
For instance, Elizabeth Drew, T. S. Eliot: The Design of His Poetry (New York: Charles Scribners, Sons, 1949).
W. B. Stanford, The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1968) p. 33, notes that one exception to the exclusive use of ‘self-possession’ for Ulysses and Penelope is in the Iliad ‘when Achilles uses the term for a man who is faithful to one woman’.
T. S. Eliot, Dante (London: Faber & Faber, 1929) p. 29. In the same essay, Eliot also refers to Ulysses as a poet when he says, ‘Tennyson’s Ulysses is primarily a very self-conscious poet V (p. 32).
Also see Grover Smith, T. S. Eliot’s Poetry and Plays, A Study in Sources and Meaning (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), for other Eliot sources alluding to chess, for example, The Tempest.
T. S. Eliot, ‘Introduction’, Selected Poems of Ezra Pound (London: Faber & Faber, 1928) pp. x-xi.
Eliot, ‘“Ulysses”, Order and Myth’, Selected Prose, ed. Frank Kermode (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975) p. 177.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cuddy, L.A. (1990). Eliot‘s Classicism: A Study in Allusional Method and Design. In: Bagchee, S. (eds) T. S. Eliot Annual No. 1. Macmillan Literary Annuals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07790-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07790-8_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07792-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07790-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)