Skip to main content

Eliot‘s Classicism: A Study in Allusional Method and Design

  • Chapter
T. S. Eliot Annual No. 1

Part of the book series: Macmillan Literary Annuals ((MLA))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Authors’ comments about their own work are deservedly suspect. However, one exception to this generalisation is T. S. Eliot. Although his enigmatic language and sometimes unfortunate phrasing have often obscured his intentions, he attempted in numerous ways to direct readers to his aesthetic philosophy and purpose throughout his career. For example, when he said that he was a ‘classicist’, he was pointing to a major aspect of his work in both conception and content; when he praised James Joyce’s ‘mythical method’, he was indirectly speaking about his own classical strategies; and when he wrote about the necessity of borrowing from another author’s work, he was describing and justifying his own allusional system. Yet, although Eliot may indeed be trusted to lead readers toward an understanding of his purpose, the classical dimension of his poetry has been relatively ignored.1 To rectify this critical oversight, this article will examine the extent and substance of Eliot’s classicism, how it relates to his own allusional and ‘mythical method’, and how this classical context adds new meaning to Eliot’s poems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Hazel Barnes, The Meddling Gods, Four Essays on Classical Themes (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1974), for one study which is, by intention, limited to one chapter on Eliot’s drama.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. S. Eliot, ‘East Coker’, The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909–1950 (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1952) p. 123. Hereafter cited in the text as CPP with page number in parentheses.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For example, Mrs Valerie Eliot, The Waste Land Facsimile (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971), pp. 128–9, noted Eliot’s use of Homer in the original draft of the poem. All extracts from this volume are reprinted with the permission of Mrs Valerie Eliot and Faber & Faber Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For instance, Elizabeth Drew, T. S. Eliot: The Design of His Poetry (New York: Charles Scribners, Sons, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. B. Stanford, The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1968) p. 33, notes that one exception to the exclusive use of ‘self-possession’ for Ulysses and Penelope is in the Iliad ‘when Achilles uses the term for a man who is faithful to one woman’.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. S. Eliot, Dante (London: Faber & Faber, 1929) p. 29. In the same essay, Eliot also refers to Ulysses as a poet when he says, ‘Tennyson’s Ulysses is primarily a very self-conscious poet V (p. 32).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Also see Grover Smith, T. S. Eliot’s Poetry and Plays, A Study in Sources and Meaning (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), for other Eliot sources alluding to chess, for example, The Tempest.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. S. Eliot, ‘Introduction’, Selected Poems of Ezra Pound (London: Faber & Faber, 1928) pp. x-xi.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eliot, ‘“Ulysses”, Order and Myth’, Selected Prose, ed. Frank Kermode (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975) p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuddy, L.A. (1990). Eliot‘s Classicism: A Study in Allusional Method and Design. In: Bagchee, S. (eds) T. S. Eliot Annual No. 1. Macmillan Literary Annuals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07790-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics