Skip to main content
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

The catechism repeated dutifully in official speeches is that defense programs and arms control must work together to advance the nation’s security. The reality is far different: our attempts to integrate the two have consistently failed, a conclusion on which advocates of new nuclear weapon programs as well as passionate supporters of arms control can readily agree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Henry L. Stimson, “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb,” Harper’s, Vol. 194, (February 1947), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Also see Henry L. Stimson and McGeorge Bundy, On Active Service in Peace and War(New York: Harper & Brothers, 1947 ), p. 633.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eindhovensch Dagblad, August 8, 1946, reprinted and translated in Sydnor H. Walker, ed., The First One Hundred Days of the Atomic Age ( New York: Woodrow Wilson Foundation, 1946 ), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Robert Oppenheimer, “Physics in the Contemporary World,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 4, No. 3 (March 1948), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The GAC reports are reprinted in Herbert F. York, The Advisors, Oppenheimer, Teller and the Superbomb (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See David Alan Rosenberg, “American Atomic Strategy and the Hydrogen Bomb Decision,” Journal of American History, Vol. 66, No. 1 (June 1979), Pp. 62–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas C. Schelling and Morton H. Halperin, Strategy and Ann.s Control ( New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1961 ), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonathan Schell, The Fate of the Earth ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1982 ), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Control and Reduction of Armaments, Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 85th Congress, 2nd Session (Washington, D.C., 1958), Pt. 11, p. 1003; and George F. Kennan, Russia, The Atom and the West (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1958), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. George Kennan, “Two Views of the Soviet Problem,” The New Yorker (November 2, 1981), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Michael Krepon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krepon, M. (1984). Two Camps. In: Strategic Stalemate: Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control in American Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07719-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics