Skip to main content

Individual Differences in Reading Ability: A New Perspective

  • Chapter
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will trace developments in the attempt to describe and understand individual differences in reading ability which have considerable significance for educational psychologists. It begins with the psychometric tradition and moves through the analysis of component skills to the study of understanding, strategies and goals. The perspective grows beyond looking at the individual as a complex of abilities and incorporates the learner’s intentions and knowledge. This has important consequences for psychological and educational practice in relation to research, diagnosis of difficulty, and approaches to teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayers, D. and Downing, J. (1982) ‘Testing children’s concepts of reading’, Educational Research, 24, pp. 277–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1978) ‘Intelligence and general strategies’, in G. Underwood (ed), Strategies of Information Processing, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1979) ‘Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children’s reading of words’, Child Development, 50, pp. 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. (1974–5) ‘Case study of the effect of instruction on pupils’ reading strategies’, Reading Research Quarterly, 10, pp. 555–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. (1978) ‘Influence of instruction on early reading’, in L. J. Chapman and P. Czerniewska (eds), Reading: From Process to Practice, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, J. (1958) ‘The child’s learning of English morphology’, Word, 14, pp. 150–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1970) ‘The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read’, Reading Research Quarterly, 6, pp. 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boder, E. (1973) ‘Developmental dyslexia: a diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns’, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, pp. 663–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1976) ‘A developmental study of children’s reading strategies’, Educational Review, 29, pp. 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C., Chapman, R. S. and Venezky, R. L. (1970) ‘How a child needs to think to learn to read’, Technical Report No. 131, Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning. Also in L. W. Gregg (ed), Cognition in Learning and Memory, New York: John Wiley, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. M. (1976) Young Fluent Readers, London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1969) ‘Reading errors and self-correction behaviour’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, pp. 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. B. (1944) ‘Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading’, Psychometrika, 9, pp. 185–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolch, E. W. and Bloomster, M. (1937) ‘Phonic readiness’, Elementary School Journal, 38, pp. 201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. (1970) ‘Children’s concepts of language in learning to read’, Educational Research, 12, pp. 106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. and Downing, M. (1984) ‘Metacognitive readiness for literacy learning’, Papua New Guinea Journal of Education, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. and Leong, C. K. (1982) Psychology of Reading, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1979) ‘Linguistic insight: threshold of reading acquisition’, in T. G. Waller and G. E. MacKinnon (eds), Reading ResearchAdvances in Theory and Practice Vol. 1, New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1981) Styles of Learning and Teaching, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1973) ‘Children’s experience of reading and notions of units in language’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, pp. 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1975) Language in Childhood, London: Paul Elek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1982) Learning to Read, London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1984) ‘Children’s knowledge of orthography in learning to read’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, pp. 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. (1980) ‘Component skills in reading: measurement of individual differences through chronometric analysis’, in R. E. Snow, P. Frederico and W. E. Montague (eds), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 1: Cognitive Process Analysis of Aptitude, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980) ‘Unexpected spelling problems’, in U. Frith (ed), Cognitive Processes in Spelling, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. and Frith, C. (1980) ‘Relationships between reading and spelling’, in J. F. Kavanagh and R. L. Venezky (eds), Orthography, Reading and Dyslexia, Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1965) ‘A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading’, Elementary English, 42, pp. 639–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunzer, E., Waite, M. and Dolan, T. (1979) ‘Comprehension and comprehension tests’, in E. Lunzer and K. Gardner (eds), The Effective Use of Reading, London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1975) ‘On non-verbatim learning. 1. Level of processing and level of outcome’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, pp. 273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976) ‘On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 115–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, I. G. (1979) ‘Reading, linguistic awareness and language acquisition’. Paper written for IRA/University of Victoria Reading Research Seminar, June 26–30, University of Victoria, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphett, M. V. and Washburne, C. (1931) ‘When should children begin to read?’ Elementary School Journal, 31, pp. 496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976) ‘Styles and strategies of learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, pp. 128–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, F. (1983) ‘Teaching children to use the linguistic context more effectively’, Reading, 17, pp. 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. (1966) ‘Learning to think about reading’, Educational Research, 9, pp. 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, T. (1980) ‘Reading of hiragana’, in J. F. Kavanagh and R. L. Venezky (eds), Orthography, Reading and Dyslexia, Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, T. and Makita, K. (1973) ‘Japan’, in J. Downing (ed). Comparative Reading, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1982) Learning and Understanding, Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 41, Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981) The Psychology of Literacy, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D. and Liberman, I. Y. (1972) ‘Misreading: a search for causes’, in J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds), Language by Ear and by Eye, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderbergh, R. (1971) Reading in Early Childhood, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1946) ‘Note on a reanalysis of Davis’ reading tests’, Psychometrika, 11, pp. 185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrey, J. W. (1979) ‘Reading that comes naturally: The early reader’, in T. G. Waller and G. E. MacKinnon (eds), Reading ResearchAdvances in Theory and Practice, Vol. 1, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. and Hung, D. (1980) ‘Reading in a non-alphabetic writing system-— some experimental studies’, in J. F. Kavanagh and R. L. Venezky (eds), Orthography, Reading and Dyslexia, Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G. (1978) ‘Concepts in information processing theory’, in G. Underwood (ed), Strategies of Information Processing, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M. D. (1971) Reading and its Difficulties, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1950) The Structure of Human Abilities, Edinburgh: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (1970) ‘A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors’, Reading Research Quarterly, 5, pp. 427–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1986 Christopher Bagley and Gajendra K. Verma

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Francis, H. (1986). Individual Differences in Reading Ability: A New Perspective. In: Bagley, C., Verma, G.K. (eds) Personality, Cognition and Values. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07599-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics