Skip to main content

Interdependence: a Drug of Addiction?

  • Chapter
Diplomacy at Sea

Abstract

Interdependence is the convenient slogan commonly employed today to explain and justify Britain’s external policies — economic, military and political — the euphemism that masks the reality of dependence and of the progressive, if still partial, surrender of British sovereignty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Thomas Babington Macaulay, Frederic the Great (Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1855) pp. 30–1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lyon Playfair, Subjects of Social Welfare (Cassell, 1889) p. 307. Lyon Playfair, a Scot, was Edinburgh Professor of Chemistry, a protégé of the Prince Consort, a constant gadfly, a MP, a Minister and ultimately a Peer (1818–98).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sir Robert Ensor, England 1870–1914 (Oxford University Press, 1936) p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 227, and Andrew Shonfield, British Economic Policy Since the War (Penguin, 1958) p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Playfair, op. cit., p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. F. Harrod, The Life of John Maynard Keynes (Macmillan, 1951) pp. 426–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (Macmillan, 1919) p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ian H. Nish, The Anglo-Japanese Alliance (Athlone Press, 1966) p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. P. Taylor, English History 1914–1945 (Pelican, 1970) p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harold Nicolson, King George V (Constable, 1952) p. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radio broadcast of 9 February 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Margaret Gowing, Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy 1945–1952, vol. I: Policy Making (Macmillan, 1974) p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  14. These undertakings, as described to Parliament by Mr Heseltine on 1 February 1983, are not, in any case, of a particularly impressive character. President Truman reaffirmed in 1952 ‘the understanding that the use of these bases in an emergency would be a matter for joint decision of Her Majesty’s Government and the United States Government in the light of circumstances at the time’ (The Times, 2 February 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael M. Harrison, The Reluctant Ally: France and Atlantic Security (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981) p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Defence in the 1980s: Statement on the Defence Estimates 1980, vol. I (HMSO) Cmnd 7826-I, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Captain John O. Coote RN, ‘Send Her Victorious’, United States Naval Institute Proceedings, January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. James Cable, The Royal Navy and the Siege of Bilbao (Cambridge University Press, 1979) p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. W. Kirby, The Decline of British Economic Power Since 1870 (George Allen and Unwin, 1981) p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magnus Clarke, The Nuclear Destruction of Britain (Croom Helm, 1982) passim.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bernard Ledwidge, De Gaulle (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1982) p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 383.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The United Kingdom and the European Communities (HMSO, July 1971) Cmnd 4715, para. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Compiled from the relevant tables in Economic Trends — Annual Supplement 1982 (Central Statistical Office, HSMO, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richard E. Caves and Lawrence B. Krause, Britain’s Economic Performance (The Brookings Institution, Washington, 1980) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Field Marshal the Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, Memoirs (Collins, 1958) p. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The addiction, perhaps this is not too strong a word, of this article to the outcome of predictions as the test of argument should not be construed as unreserved endorsement of the scientific approach to political problems. This has pitfalls which even Lyon Playfair did not escape, as in his comment on the great Irish Famine of 1847–8:

    Google Scholar 

  29. As the population lessened, the production of potatoes per acre decreased.… The reason for the decline is curious… the best manure for any crop is the refuse of the animal which lives upon it… when the people emigrated they took their manurial value with them, and the diminished population did not supply sufficient manure for the crops. (Thomas Wemyss Reid (ed.), Memoirs and Correspondence of Lyon Playfair (P. M. Pollak Science Reprints, Jemimaville, Scotland, 1976) p. 100)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 James Cable

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cable, J. (1985). Interdependence: a Drug of Addiction?. In: Diplomacy at Sea. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07550-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics