Skip to main content

Risk and Financial Institutions

  • Chapter
British Banking, 1960–85
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

The modern theory of risk owes its origins to Keynes (1936) and Hicks (1939). They propounded the theory of liquidity preference, arguing that, other things including return being equal, investors prefer liquid assets of certain value to illiquid assets of uncertain value. This allows them to meet potential and unforeseeable demands for funds. Thus investors require an additional return, known as a risk premium, on assets whose price varies, in order to compensate for the uncertainty about the price that such assets may command at any time. It was also argued that borrowers would prefer long-dated liabilities which require fixed interest payments for the duration of the debt. This means that, for the life of the loan, they face known interest payments and that they can make, well in advance, the arrangements necessary for its repayment. Indeed, if borrowers did not have reasons for preferring long-term debt, there would be no market in such debt. Private borrowers must be prepared to pay the premium demanded by the lenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. A recent analysis of the behaviour of unit trusts (Corner and Matatko, 1984), suggests that the average unit trust has done worse than the market as a whole (although investors may not know this). But it is not clear in their analysis what allowance has been made for management charges, which are probably lower than those which a small investor managing his own portfolio would face. In any case, maturity-matching institutions have attractions apart from investment skills. Hills (1984) draws attention to the tax efficiency of different types of investment and suggests that the tax treatment may be very important.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This was true even before the statistical change of 1975 (see Chapter 7).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A secondary bank is one which relies mainly on other banks as a source of deposits.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This policy is now embodied in the liquidity and solvency requirements which the Bank of England can impose under the 1979 Banking Act (Chapter 3).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galbraith (1955) cites land speculation as a precursor of the Wall Street boom and crash.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 the Estate of the late John Grady, and Martin Weale

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grady, J., Weale, M. (1986). Risk and Financial Institutions. In: British Banking, 1960–85. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07535-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics