Skip to main content
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

The second decade of the nineteenth century saw an extremely complex and much neglected series of changes in Coleridge’s poetic and intellectual development. The miseries and creative decline recorded in ‘Dejection: An Ode’ hang over the early years of the period, reaching a climax with the demise of The Friend and the break with Sara Hutchinson in the winter of 1810–11. On the other hand, it was the period of his most developed literary criticism, including the Shakespeare Lectures of 1811–12 and concluding with the publication of Biographia Literaria in 1817. His study of literature, against the background of contemporary German philosophy and criticism, led him into discussions of aesthetics, history and Christian theology, and are a necessary study as a prelude to considering both his later theological and philosophical writings, and his later poetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Thomas McFarland, ‘The Origin and Significance of Coleridge’s Theory of Secondary Imagination’, in Geoffrey H. Hartman (ed.), New Perspectives on Coleridge and Wordsworth (New York, 1972) pp. 195–246, esp. p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tetens, Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung (Leipzig, 1777) vol. I, p. 117. The text used is from Coleridge’s annotated copy in the British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. M. MacKinnon, ‘Coleridge and Kant’, in John Beer (ed.), Coleridge’s Variety: Bicentenary Studies (London, 1974) pp. 183–203, esp.p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and Critical Tradition (New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (London, 1950) pp. 132–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kant, The Critique of Judgement, trans. James Creed Meredith (Oxford, 1928) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Austin Farrer, Faith and Speculation: An Essay in Philosophical Theology (London, 1967) p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hobbes, Leviathan (1651), ed. C. B. Macpherson (Harmondsworth, 1968) pp. 88–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geoffrey H. Hartman, Wordsworth’s Poetry, 1787-1814 (New Haven, Conn., 1964) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Roy Park, ‘Coleridge and Kant: Poetic Imagination and Practical Reason’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 8 (1968) pp. 336–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benedetto Groce, Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic, trans. Douglas Ainslie (New York, 1955) p. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  12. James D. Boulger, ‘Coleridge on Imagination Revisited’, The Wordsworth Circle, IV (1973) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wordsworth, ‘Essay, Supplementary to the Preface’ (1815), Poetical Works (Oxford, 1969) p. 744.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kant, The Inaugural Dissertation (1770), in Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck, trans. G. B. Kerferd and D. E. Walford (Manchester, 1968) pp. 66, 70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. James Beattie, ‘An Essay on Poetry and Music as They Affect the Mind’ (1762), in Essays (Edinburgh, 1776) p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge, Mass., 1980) p. 26.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. J. S. Mill, ‘Coleridge’, in Mill’s Essays on Literature and Society, ed. J. B. Schneewind (New York, 1965) p. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schiller, Kleinere prosaische Schriften (Leipzig, 1800) vol. 2, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For further discussion of Herder, Eichhorn and Coleridge on this point, see E. S. Shaffer, ‘Kubla Khan’ and the Fall of Jerusalem (Cambridge, 1975) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wayne C. Booth, A Rhetoric of Irony (Chicago, 1974) p. 92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Northrop Frye, The Great Code: The Bible and Literature (London, 1982) p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. N. G. Orsini, ‘Coleridge and Schlegel Reconsidered’, Comparative Literature, XVI (1964) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Gabriel Marcel, Coleridge et Schelling (Paris, 1971) pp. 84–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Schlegel, Literary Notebooks, 1797–1801, ed. Hans Eichner (Toronto, 1957) p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Schlegel, Gespräch über die Poesie (1800), in Kritische Ausgabe, vol. II, p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Schlegel, Lyceums-Fragmente, nos 42, 47 and 54, Prosaische Jugendschriften, ed. J. Minor (Vienna, 1882) vol. II pp. 189–91. See also K. M.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wheeler, Sources, Processes and Methods in Coleridge’s ‘Biographia Literaria’ (Cambridge, 1980) p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Victoria University Library, Toronto. See, Laurence S. Lockridge, Coleridge the Moralist (Ithaca, NY, 1977) pp. 193–8: ‘Irony and the Coleridgean Personality’.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Solger, Nachgelassene Schriften und Briefwechsel, ed. L. Tieck and F. von Raumer (Leipzig, 1826) vol. 1, p. 117. And see Wheeler, op. cit., p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Basil Willey, Samuel Taylor Coleridge (London, 1972) p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stephen Prickett, Coleridge and Wordsworth: The Poetry of Growth (Cambridge, 1970) p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See further Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics (London, 1975) p. 130.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Northrop Frye, The Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (New York, 1969) pp. 127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stephen Happel, ‘Words Made Beautiful by Grace: on Coleridge the Theologian’, Religious Studies Review, 6 (1980) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See also Thomas McFarland, Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition (Oxford, 1969) pp. 379–80.

    Google Scholar 

  36. John J. Duffy, ‘Problems in Publishing Coleridge: James Marsh’s First American Edition of Aids to Reflection’, New England Quarterly, 43 (1970) 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. James Marsh, ‘Preliminary Essay’ (1829), AR (II), p. xxv.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. H. Hodgson, The Philosophy of Reflection (London, 1878) vol. 1, p. 177; vol. 2, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See Terence Hawkes, Metaphor. The Critical Idiom, 25 (London, 1972) p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See further Dorothy Emmet, ‘Coleridge and Philosophy’, in R. L. Brett (ed.), Writers and their Background: S. T. Coleridge (London, 1971) p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Owen Barfield, What Coleridge Thought (Middletown, Conn., 1971) p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jerome Christensen, Coleridge’s Blessed Machine of Language (Ithaca, NY, 1981) pp. 109, 117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 David Jasper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jasper, D. (1985). The Critical Prose. In: Coleridge as Poet and Religious Thinker. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07509-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics