Advertisement

Stalin pp 133-160 | Cite as

Builder

  • Robert H. McNeal
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

Nothing was more generally or readily agreed among Bolsheviks than the proposition that Russia needed massive industrial growth in order to achieve a socialist society. While sharing this concensus, Stalin did not distinguish himself as an early or emphatic advocate of rapid industrial growth, once pre-war levels of production had been achieved in 1926. In that year he even opposed a proposal to undertake construction of a huge dam on the Dnieper River, comparing this to the folly of a peasant who invested precious savings in a gramophone when he should have used it to repair his plough. Perhaps Stalin, influenced by Bukharin, did indeed believe that the best investment strategy at that point was the renovation of existing plants rather than the expansion of electric power production before there was a market for it. Or he may merely have opposed the dam because Trotsky had proposed it.

Keywords

Central Committee Hydroelectric Project October Revolution Civic Cult Labour Camp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    L. D. Trotsky, The Challenge of the Left Opposition (1926–27) (New York, 1980) 222–3. Stalin also may have been influenced by the Soviet engineer Shatunovsky, who considered the project a poor investment (W, XI, 281; W, XIII, 17–19 ).Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    K. E. Bailes, Technology and Society under Lenin and Stalin ( Princeton, NJ, 1978 ) 69–121;Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A. I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (New York, 1974–8)I, 376–407; The Case of N. P. Vitvitsky, V. A. Gusev, A. W. Gregory et al. (Moscow, 1933).Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    N. Jasny, Soviet Industrialization 1928–1952 (Chicago, 1961) 51–69.Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    E. Zaleski, Planning for Economic Growth in the Soviet Union 1918–1932 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1971) 117; W, XII, 323–4; Istoriia SSSR s drevneishikh vremen do nashikh dnei (Moscow, 1967) VII, , 468.Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    L. Shatunovskaia, Zhizn’ v Kremle (New York, 1982) 72–3. This memoirist commands respect when speaking of things that she knew from direct personal experience, though in some other matters she seems to be merely passing on the anecdotes of her set. Her reliability on matters that she knew at first hand gains credibility in that there is actually a letter from Stalin to her husband in W, XIII, 18–20, confirming her assertions that the Boss communicated with this middle-level official. An unrelated case of Stalin’s arbitrary assignment of a worker to a technically demanding post appears in A. G. Zverev, Zapiski ministra (Moscow, 1973 ) 142–3.Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    Yu. Flakserman, Gleb Maksimovich Krzizhanovskii (Moscow, 1964) 172.Google Scholar
  8. 21.
    T. Kirstein, ‘Das Ural-Kuzneck-Kombinat (UKK) als objekt einer Entscheidungsprozessanalyse’ in G. Erler and W. Süss (eds), Stalinismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1982) 167–85; KPSS, IV, 398–404.Google Scholar
  9. 27.
    J. Miller, ‘Soviet Planners in 1936–1937’, in J. Degras and R. W. Davies (eds), Soviet Planning (Oxford, 1964 ) 120.Google Scholar
  10. 33.
    See p. 129 above; N. A. Ivnitsky, Klassovaia bo’rba v derevene i likvidatsiia kulachestva kak klassa (1929–1932) (Moscow, 1972 ) 298.Google Scholar
  11. 34.
    M. Gorky et al. (eds), Belomor (New York, 1935) 329; Solzhenitsyn (1974–8) II, 75;Google Scholar
  12. 34.
    P. H. Solomon, ‘Soviet Penal Policy, 1917–1934; a Reinterpretation’, Slavic Review, no. 2 (1980) 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 38.
    I. Averbakh, Ot prestupleniia k trudu (Moscow, 1936 ).Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    P, 14 July 1930, 11 February 1934; P. Reiman, Die Geburt des Stalinismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1979) 237–46;Google Scholar
  15. 40.
    R. W. Daniels, The Conscience of the Revolution ( Cambridge, Mass., 1960 ) 376–7;Google Scholar
  16. 40.
    S. F. Cohen, Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution (New York, 1973 ) 349–50.Google Scholar
  17. 41.
    See p. 121 above. R. A. Medvedev, Let History Judge (New York, 1971) 142. Kirov publicly stated that Syrtsov and Lominadze had been removed from their positions (P, 2 December 1930 ).Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    R. W. Davies, ‘The Syrtsov-Lominadze Affair’, Soviet Studies, no. 1 (1981) 29–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 41.
    M. Buber-Neumann, Von Potsdam nach Moskau (Stuttgart, 1957) 232.Google Scholar
  20. 46.
    Stalin. Sbornik statei k piatidesiatiletiiu so dnia rozhdeniia (Moscow, 1929) especially 167, 258–68; J. L. Heizer, The Cult of Stalin 1929–1939 (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1977) 65–8, 81–98.Google Scholar
  21. 48.
    Heizer (1977) 109; G. Alekseev, ‘Kolichestvennye parametry kul’ta lichnosti’, SSSR. Vnutrenie protivorecheniia, no. 6 (1982) 9.Google Scholar
  22. 52.
    Arkhiv, x, kn. 1, 260–1; R. A. Medvedev, ‘New Pages from the Political Biography of Stalin’, in R. C. Tucker (ed.), Stalinism. Essays in Historical Interpretation (New York, 1977) 119.Google Scholar
  23. 58.
    P, 28 June 1933; P, 13 August 1933; Iskusstvo, no. 1 (1934) 99, 112; no. 1 (1935) 7; I. Rabinovich, ‘Obraz Vozhdia v proizvedenniakh zhivopisi i skulptury’, Arkhitektura SSSR, no. 12 (1939) 11–21, which sustains the thesis that not much painting and sculpture were devoted to Stalin before 1933.Google Scholar
  24. 70.
    R. C. Tucker, ‘The Rise of Stalin’s Personality Cult’, American Historical Review, no. 2 (1979) 347–66;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 70.
    J. Barber, Soviet Historians in Crisis (New York, 1981) 126–36;Google Scholar
  26. 70.
    A. Nekrich, Otreshis’ of strakha (London, 1979 ) 17–20;Google Scholar
  27. 70.
    L. Kolakowski, Main Currents of Marxism (Oxford, 1978) III 73–6; W, XI, 128–34.Google Scholar
  28. 73.
    S. Fitzpatrick (ed.), Cultural Revolution in Russia 1928–1931 ( Bloomington, Ind., 1977 ) 207–40;Google Scholar
  29. 73.
    S. F. Starr, Melnikov: Solo Architect in a Mass Society (Princeton, NJ, 1978 ).Google Scholar
  30. 74.
    A. Fadeev (ed.), Vstrechi s Stalinym (Moscow, 1939) 84–93;Google Scholar
  31. 74.
    V. A. Vesnim et al., ‘Nezabyvaemye vstrechi’, Arckhitektura SSSR, no. 12 (1939) 6–10.Google Scholar
  32. 75.
    Fitzpatrick (1977) 237; A. Kopp, Town and Revolution (New York, 1970 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert H. McNeal 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. McNeal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations