Advertisement

Stalin pp 85-111 | Cite as

Heirs

  • Robert H. McNeal
Chapter
  • 16 Downloads
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

Shortly after Lenin’s medical crisis in March 1923 the Politburo had started to issue regular medical bulletins, seemingly preparing the Soviet public for his death, but in mid-May these ceased and were not resumed even when his condition declined again in the first half of June.1 Evidently Stalin thought it not in his own or the state’s interest to ready the public for a succession of power. Much better for him if there were no pressure either from the masses of the governed or from senior party and state officials squarely to face the need to establish a new arrangement of power. Stalin held the high cards and wanted no new shuffle and deal.

Keywords

Communist Party Central Committee Party Member Party Line October Revolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    L. D. Trotsky, Stalin (New York, 1941 ) 378–82;Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Lermolo, The Face of a Victim (New York, 1955) 135–7;Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    L. Shatunovskaia, Zhizn’ v Kremle (New York, 1982) 234.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    On the autopsy, N. Tumarkin, Lenin Lives! ( Cambridge, Mass., 1983 ) 169–72.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    L. D. Trotsky, My Life (New York, 1930) 508–9; Tumarkin (1983) 157–9.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    N. K. Krupskaia, O Lenine (Moscow, 1960 ) 11–12.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    E. Yaroslayskii, Velikii vozhd’ rabochei revoliutsii (Moscow, 1918), source decaying, page numbers uncertain.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Tumarkin (1983) 176–9, 181–2; N. Valentinov, Novaia ekonomicheskaia politika i krizis partii posle smerti Lenina (Stanford, Calif., 1971) 90–2; W, VI, 443; on the absence of crematoria, Moskva. Entsiklopediia (Moscow, 1980 ) 385.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    W, VI, 71–196, 444. T. Zelenev, ‘Izdanie i rasprostranenie proizvedenii I. V. Stalina’, Bol’shevik, no. 23 (1949) 93, shows 16 980 000 copies of Voprosy leninizma published by 1949.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    W, vi, 77, 137, 110–11; R. H. McNeal (ed.), Stalin’s Works. An Annotated Bibliography ( Stanford, Calif., 1967 ) 110–11.Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    L. D. Trotsky, Sochineniia (Moscow, 1924–7);Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    G. Zinoviev, Sochineniia (Moscow, 1924–6);Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    L. B. Kamenev, Stat’i i rechi 1905–1925 (Leningrad, 1925–9).Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    L. D. Trotsky, The Challenge of the Left Opposition (1923–25) (New York, 1975 ) 199–258.Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    Trotsky (1930) 518; A. S. Kalabashkin, Vernyi syn partii (Kishinev, 1960) 228. This work adds that the commission included ‘others’, the usual method of referring to people who later were declared to be traitors, quite likely Zinoviev and/or Kamenev in this case.Google Scholar
  16. 42.
    L. D. Trotsky, The Challenge of the Left Opposition (1926–27) (New York, 1980) 130–64, especially 160–1.Google Scholar
  17. 45.
    Trotsky (1980) 301–94; 258–64; W, x, 4, 169–70; E. H. Carr and R. W. Davies, A History of Soviet Russia. The Foundations of a Planned Economy (New York, 1969–1978), vol. II, 3–53.Google Scholar
  18. 48.
    L. D. Trotsky, Leon Trotsky on China (New York, 1976). W,IX, 224–34, 243–273, 288–318; W, X, 10–39.Google Scholar
  19. 49.
    The party statutes governing the electoral system appear in RDCPSU, II, 90–98, 178–86, 269–83; T. H. Rigby, ‘Party Elections in the CPSU’, Political Quarterly, no. 4 (1964) 420–43.Google Scholar
  20. 50.
    H.-H. Schroeder, ‘Gesellschaftliche Funktion and innere Entwicklung der bolschewistischen Partei in den Jahren der NEP 1921–1928’, in G. Erler and W. Süss (eds), Stalinismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1982 ) 96–7.Google Scholar
  21. 50.
    On finance, R. H. McNeal, ‘The Beginning of Communist Party Financial Exactions from the Soviet State’, in D. A. Loeber (ed.), Ruling Communist Parties and Their Status under Law (Dordrecht, 1986 ) 189–94.Google Scholar
  22. 56.
    V. T. Reck, Boris Pil’iak. A Soviet Writer in Conflict with the State (Montreal, 1975 ) 13–51;Google Scholar
  23. 56.
    B. Pilnyak, The Tale of the Unextinguished Moon (New York, 1967 );Google Scholar
  24. 56.
    E. H. Carr, ‘Pilnyak and the Death of Frunze’, Soviet Studies, no. 2 (1958) 162–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 57.
    W. Lerner, Karl Radek. The Last Internationalist (Stanford, Calif., 1970) 130, on Radek’s expulsion.Google Scholar
  26. 62.
    Carr and Davies (1979–78), II, 32–4; P. Reiman, Die Geburt des Stalinismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1979 ) 51–2.Google Scholar
  27. 68.
    P, 10 November 1927; L. Ivanov and A. N. Shmelev, Leninizm i ideinopoliticheskii razgrom trotiskizma (Moscow, 1970) 425.Google Scholar
  28. 80.
    R. H. McNeal (ed.), Stalin’s Works. An Annotated Bibliography (Stanford, Calif., 1967) entry nos. 648, 653, 654, 658, 659, 664, 665, 673, 674, 676, 679, 685, 688, 708, 722, 726, 729, 730, 746, 747, 757, 762, 774, 776.Google Scholar
  29. 82.
    KSG, 102, 238. An exceptionally explicit statement of this point among many is in V. Donskoi and S. Ikonnikov, ‘Razvitie leninskikh idei o partiinogosudarstvennym kontrole’, Kommunist, no. 18 (1962) 37.Google Scholar
  30. 84.
    R. D. Warth, Leon Trotsky (Boston, 1977) 137. Trotsky probably was not present when Stalin first read this material, but Kamenev, Trotsky’s brother-in-law and, for a time, political ally probably was present. Warth discovered this in the Max Eastman archive, which shows that Trotsky wrote this to Eastman, deleting the expletive.Google Scholar
  31. 87.
    M. Eastman, Since Lenin Died (London, 1925) 28–31; Bol’shevik, no. 16 (1925) 71–3.Google Scholar
  32. 90.
    R. A. Medvedev, Let History Judge (New York, 1971) 28–9, says that he saw this publication, but it was still very hard to obtain in 1983, when I could not find it listed in the catalogue of the social sciences library of the Academy of Sciences, a privileged institution. The sanitization of Stalin’s speech on the subject is treated in McNeal, Stalin’s Works (1967) 129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert H. McNeal 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. McNeal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations