Advertisement

Stalin pp 27-44 | Cite as

Petrograd

  • Robert H. McNeal
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

As it turned out Stalin did not have to wait until July 1917, when his term of exile would have expired. On 2 March Nicholas II abdicated the throne of Russia, and a Provisional Government of liberals assumed precarious power. The capital to which Stalin returned on 12 March was a very different place from the city he had known, quite apart from the fact that the tsarist government had renamed it ‘Petrograd’ as part of the anti-German mood of wartime. Not only did the new government support a full range of civil liberties for all political factions, they had no choice but to permit the existence of a rival authority, the ‘Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies’, which had taken form as the old regime collapsed. Although composed of elected delegates from factories and military units of the capital city only, it possessed from the outset enormous prestige as a symbol of some kind of radical democratic order for all Russia.

Keywords

Central Committee National Minority Electoral District Military Organization Peace Negotiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    N. N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917 (New York, 1955) 158;Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    R. B. Browder and A. F. Kerensky (eds), The Russian Provisional Government 1917. Documents (Stanford, Calif., 1961 ) II, 1077–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. H. McNeal (ed.), Stalin’s Works. An Annotated Bibliography (Stanford, Calif., 1967) 113, 185–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    RDCPSU, I 202–3; A. Shliapnikov, Semnadtsatyi god (Moscow, 1925) 180–2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W, n, 4–9, 16–16; L. Trotsky, The Stalin School of Falsification (New York, 1971 ) 236–9.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    E. N. Burdzhalov, ‘O taktike Bol’shevikov v marte-aprele 1917 g.’, Voprosy istorii no. 4 (1956) 47–50;Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    E. N. Burdzhalov, Vtoraia russkaia revoliutsiia. Moskva, front, periferiia (Moscow, 1971) 376; CW, XXIII, 295–342;Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Raskol’nikov, ‘Priezd tov. Lenina Rossiiu’, Proletarskaia revoliutsiia, no. 1 (1923) 221.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    I. Tsereteli, Vospominaniia fevral’skoi revoliutsii (Paris, 1963)I, 133; Sukhanov (1955) 229–30, where he mentions Stalin as a ‘grey blur’. This attests not to mediocre ability but to the role assigned him: to observe and keep the Bolsheviks at a distance from the policies of the other parties in the Soviet. W, III, 46–50.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    RDCPSU I,249–61; W, III, 121–30, 182–92; VILBK IV, 304; in general on Lenin’s position and the party congress, A. Rabinowitch, The Bolsheviks Come to Power (New York, 1976) 59–62, 83–90.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    Feliks Edmundovich Dzerzhinskii. Biografiia (Moscow, 1977) 134–5; K. Sverdlova, Yakov Sverdlov (Moscow, 1981) 92–3.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    R. S. Delon, Stalin and Social Democracy. The Political Memoirs of David A. Sagirashvili (Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgetown University, 1974 ) 199.Google Scholar
  13. 31.
    BOR 127–40; J. L. H. Keep (ed.), The Debate on Soviet Power (Oxford, 1979) 92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert H. McNeal 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. McNeal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations