Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Macmillan Computer Science Series ((COMPSS))

  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

Having got a working skeletal expert system and some rules for our application, we are faced with the inevitable question: does it work? This, again, is a question that expert systems pose in common with conventional computer systems. In just the same way that conventional applications need to be validated, so does ours. In fact, the need for validation is even greater. Conventional applications start on much firmer ground; the algorithms that they implement rest on scientific laws, established professional or business practices, or equally well-assured grounds. In contrast, what we are implementing is far less assured, resting mainly on heuristics, rules of thumb or, at most, formulations borne out by practice but never subjected to rigorous examination before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • The nature, process, and verifiability of judgements is laid bare in the book by Sir Geoffrey Vickers, The Art of Judgement: A Study in Policy Making (University Paperbacks, Methuen, 1968) and should be made compulsory reading for prospective knowledge engineers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 Peter S. Sell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sell, P.S. (1985). Validation. In: Expert Systems — A Practical Introduction. Macmillan Computer Science Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07416-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07416-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07418-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07416-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics