Skip to main content

Abstract

In the first of his 1985 Tanner Lectures at Harvard, Kenneth Arrow suggested that the doctrine of extended sympathy might, so to speak, come to the rescue of economists and philosophers left bereft by the Impossibility Theorem (according to which no social-choice function exists that satisfies a set of reasonable axioms of consistency, transitivity, independence or irrelevant alternatives, and …). Specifically, he made reference to the pre-Rawls suggestions of William Vickrey (1945) and of John C. Harsanyi (1955) as providing related derivations of additive interpersonal utilities by reliance on certain elements of extended sympathy.

I owe thanks to the MIT Sloan School of Management for my Gordon Y. Billard Fellowship, and to Aase Huggins for valiant editorial assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, S. S. (1974) ‘Social Evaluation Through National Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(4): 597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M. (1953) ‘, Le Comportement de l’, Homme Rationel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’, Ecole Americaine’, Econometrica, 21: 503–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values(New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1985) ‘, The Unknown Other’, Tanner Lectures, April 15–17, Harvard University (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1938) ‘A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economies’Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52: 310–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1954) ‘On the Concept of Social Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 233–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., A. Sen, and D. Starrett (1973) ‘Notes on the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 6: 180–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881) Mathematical Psychics(London: Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. (1952) ‘A Cardinal Concept of Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66: 366–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1947) ‘erner on the Economics of Control’, Journal of Political Economy, 55: 405–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1932) New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility (Tubingen: Mohr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964) ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1953) ‘Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking’, Journal of Political Economy, 61: 434–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E. and D. Schmeidler (1977) ‘Aggregation Procedures for Cardinal Preferences: A Formulation and Proof of Samuelson’s Impossibility Conjecture’, Econometrica, 45: 1431–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1944) ‘Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand’, Journal of Political Economy, 52: 289–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A. P. (1945) Economics of Control (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1982a) ‘A Stronger Characterization of Declining Risk Aversion’, Econometrica 50, 1069–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1982b) ‘“Expected Utility” Analysis Without the Independence Axiom’, Econometrica, 50: 273–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. (1975) Equality and Efficiency, The Big Tradeoff(Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1950) ‘Probability and the Attempts to Measure Utility’ (English and Japanese) The Economic Review(Keizai Kenkyu), (Tokyo: Hitotsubashi University) 1: 167–73

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stiglitz (ed) The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson(henceforth referred to as CSP) 1966, vol. 1, Chapter 12 (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1964) ‘A.P. Lerner at Sixty’, Review of Economic Studies, 31: 169–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Merton (ed) CSP 1972, vol. 3, Chapter 183 (Cambridge, Mass.: the MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1965) ‘Postscript’, in J. E. Stiglitz (ed) CSP 1966, vol. 1, pp. 124–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1967) ‘Arrow’s Mathematical Polities’, in S. Hook (ed) Human Values and Economic Policy: A Symposium(New York: New York University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Merton (ed) CSP 1972, vol. 3, Chapter 167 (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1976) ‘Optimal Compacts for Redistribution’, in R. E Grieson (ed) Public and Urban Economics: Festschrift for William Vick-rey(Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Nagatani and K. Crowley (eds) CSP 1977, vol. 4, Chapter 257 (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1981) ‘Bergsonian Welfare Economies’, in: S. Rosefielde (ed) Economic Welfare and the Economics of Soviet Socialism, Essays in honor of Abram Bergson(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1983) Foundations of Economic Analysis, Enlarged ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973), On Economic Inequality(New York: Norton).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1981) ‘On Pareto-Efficiency and the No-Envy Concept of Equity’, Journal of Economic Theory, 3: 367–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1984) Microeconomic Analysis. 2nd ed. (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, (1945) ‘Measuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk’, Econometrica, 13: 319–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samuelson, P.A. (1987). Sparks from Arrow’s Anvil. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics