Skip to main content

Abstract

In making international comparisons among countries, or in assessing the progress of a country over time, it is customary in applied research to act as though the relevant information could be summarized by a ‘sufficient statistic’, namely the country’s income distribution. From this one obtains the mean (per capita) income and the curve of concentration, or ‘Lorenz curve’, making possible comparisons of different economies with the same per capita income.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values(New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson (Burk), A. (1938) ‘A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economies’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52: 310–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1983) ‘Pareto on Social Welfare’, Journal of Economic Literature, 21: 40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1965) ‘A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 2, The Neo-Classical Theory’, Econometrica, 33: 685–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1974) ‘Homothetic Preferences and Aggregation’, Journal of Economic Theory, 8: 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1976) ‘The Paretian Heritage’, Revue européene des sciences sociales et Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto 14(37): 65–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1982a) ‘Samuelson and Consumption Theory’, in George R. Feiwel (ed) Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics(Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff)pp. 31–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1982b) ‘Samuelson and Welfare Economics’, in George R. Feiwel (ed) Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics(Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff)pp. 152–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. (1985) ‘The Theory and Measurement of Income Distribution’, Advances in Econometrics, 4: 135–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. and J. C. Moore (1972) ‘Social Utility and the Gains from Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 2: 157–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. and J. C. Moore (1979) ‘On Social Welfare Functions and the Aggregation of Preferences’, Journal of Economic Theory, 21: 111–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. and J. C. Moore (1980a) ‘Real National Income with Homothetic Preferences and a Fixed Distribution of Income’, Econome-trica, 48: 401–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. and J. C. Moore (1980b) ‘Compensating Variation, Consumer’s Surplus, and Welfare’, American Economic Review, 70: 933–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E. (1961) ‘Aggregation of Utility Functions’, Management Science, 7: 337–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. and H. Uzawa (1971) ‘On the Integrability of Demand Functions’, in J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter, and H. F. Sonnenschein (eds) Preferences, Utility, and Demand(New York: Har-court Brace Jovanovich) pp. 114–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. (1909) Cours d’analyse, 3rd edn (Paris: Gauthiers-Villars).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannai, Y. (1977) ‘Concavifiability and Constructions of Concave Utility Functions’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 4: 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannai, Y. and R. Mantel (1978) ‘Non-Convexifiable Pareto Sets’, Econome-trica, 46: 571–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W., and A. W. Tucker (1951) ‘Nonlinear Programming’, in Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability(Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press) pp. 481–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1913) ‘Il massimo di utilità per una colletivà in Sociologia’, Giornali degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica[3], 46: 337–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, T. (1976) ‘Equivalence of Consumer Surplus, the Divisia Index of Output, and Eisenberg’s Addilog Social Utility’, Journal of Economic Theory, 13: 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, W. (1953) Principles of Mathematical Analysis(New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1956) ‘Social Indifference Curves’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1974) ‘Complementarity: An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory’, Journal of Economic Literature, 12: 1255–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1977) ‘When It Is Ethically Optimal to Allocate Money Income in Stipulated Fractional Shares’, in A. S. Blinder and P. Friedman (eds) Natural Resources, Uncertainty, and General Equilibrium Systems(New York: Academic Press) pp. 175–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chipman, J.S. (1987). When is a Fixed Income Distribution Optimal?. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics