Skip to main content

Abstract

The treatment of needs in assessing economic equity is a subject that arouses strong feelings. Very different approaches have been adopted in the study of this subject. There are those who regard differences in needs as sufficient grounds for rejecting any analysis of income inequality. For them to try to compare one distribution of income, Y1,…, Y h with another, Y1*,…, Y h *, is without meaning, since the people concerned may have quite different needs. ‘Welfare’ depends not just on income but also on other dimensions. Precisely what other dimensions we should take into account is open to debate, but most people would agree on certain factors such as health, handicap, age or family size. Arrow gives the example of ‘the haemophiliac who needs about $4,000 worth per annum of coagulant therapy to arrive at a state of security from bleeding at all comparable to that of the normal person’, an example he contrasts with the ‘facetious’ one of a person who is ‘desperate without pre-phylloxera clarets and plovers’ eggs’ (1973, p. 254).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1971) ‘A Utilitarian Approach to the Concept of Equality in Public Expenditure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85: 409–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1973) ‘Some Ordinalist—Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice’, Journal of Philosophy, 70: 245–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970) ‘On the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. and F. Bourguignon (1982) ‘The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions of Economic Status’, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (1980) Revealed Preference of Government(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, R. (1983) ‘Some Thoughts on the Measurement and Welfare Implications of Adult Equivalence Scales’, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and W. R. Russell (1974) ‘Stochastic Dominance in Choice under Uncertainty’, in M. S. Balch, D. L. McFadden and S. Y. Wu (eds) (1974) Essays on Economic Behaviour Under Uncertainty(Amsterdam: North-Holland) Chapter 5, pp. 135–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. and R. T. Michael (1980) ‘Family Size and the Distribution of Real Per Capita Income’, American Economic Review, 70: 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. and T. J. Wales (1979) ‘Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales’, American Economic Review, 69: 216–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1982) ‘Social Unity and Primary Goods’, in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds) (1982) Utilitarianism and Beyond(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 159–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1938) ‘Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment’, Economic Journal, 48: 635–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970) ‘Degrees of Cardinality and Aggregate Partial Orderings’, Econometrica, 43: 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1973) On Economic Inequality(Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1983) ‘Ranking Income Distributions’, Economica, 50: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (1987). Income Distribution and Differences in Needs. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics