Skip to main content

Natural Scientists and the Communist Party: Structure, Functions and Membership

  • Chapter
Soviet Scientists and the State

Part of the book series: Studies in Soviet History and Society ((SSHS))

  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

The USSR Academy of Sciences carries the principal responsibility for formulating and executing policy in fundamental research. Here, as in all other areas of state responsibility, such activities are supervised by the Communist Party which exerts, thereby, a profound influence on the working environment of Soviet scientists. It is the nature of this influence and the broader question of the character of the relationship existing between the Communist Party and the Soviet scientific community that the remaining chapters seek to clarify.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Yu. Burlin, Tartorganizatsiya’, p. 32; Ronald J. Hill and Peter Frank, The Soviet Communist Party (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981) pp. 22–3 and 51. Whereas the party committees of rural districts (raikoms) are directly subordinated to their respective regional party committees (pbkoms), larger cities are subdivided into urban districts, which introduces an extra tier into the party hierarchy in the form of the city party committee (gorkom). The city party committees of Moscow and Kiev, however, have been granted the status of regional committees.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jerry F. Hough and Merle Fainsod, How the Soviet Union is Governed (Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 1979) pp. 456–7; Boris Meissner, ‘The 26th Congress and Soviet Domestic Politics’, Problems of Communism (May–June 1981) pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Tatu, Power in the Kremlin (London: Collins, 1969) p. 292;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merle Fainsod, How Russia is Ruled (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967) pp. 193–202;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loren R. Graham, Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union (London: Allen Lane, 1971) pp. 444–9; J. F. Hough and M. Fainsod, How the Soviet Union is Governed, pp. 411, 425 and 644.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, R. G. Yanovskii, Politicheskaya ucheba v nauchnom kollektive (Moscow: Politizdat, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. XVIII s”ezd VKP (b): Stenograficheskii otchët (Moscow: Politizdat, 1939) pp. 571–2; see also L. Schapiro, The Communist Party of the Soviet Union (London: Methuen, 1970) p. 454.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roy A. Medvedev, On Socialist Democracy (London: Macmillan, 1975) p. 117. The correct titles of the government agencies to which Medvedev refers are: the USSR Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialised Education, and the USSR State Committee for Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See J. F. Hough and M. Fainsod, How the Soviet Union is Governed, pp. 410–24. Here it is estimated that the Central Committee apparatus employs about 1500 responsible officials. See also A. Avtorkhanov, The Communist Party Apparatus (Cleveland and New York: Meridian, 1966) pp. 209–10;

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Pravdin, ‘Inside the CPSU Central Committee’ (interview with Mervyn Matthews), Survey, vol. 20, no. 4 (Autumn 1974) pp. 94–104;

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Schapiro, ‘The General Department of the CC of the CPSU’, Survey, vol. 21, no. 3 (Summer 1975) pp. 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Harasymiw, ‘Nomenklatura: The Soviet Communist Party’s Leadership Recruitment System’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 2, no. 4 (December 1969) p. 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. For useful comment on the nomenklatura system see B. D. Lebin and M. N. Perfil’ev, Kadry apparata upravleniya v SSSR (Leningrad: Nauka, 1971) pp. 156–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. H. Rigby, Communist Party Membership in the USSR 1917–67 (Princeton University Press, 1968) pp. 449–51. See also J. F. Hough and M. Fainsod, How the Soviet Union is Governed, pp. 347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Vucinich, The Soviet Academy of Sciences (Stanford University Press, 1956) p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. D. Komkov, O. M. Karpenko, B. V. Levshin and L. K. Semenov, Akademiya nauk shtab sovetskoi nauki (Moscow: Nauka, 1968) p. 185; J. F. Hough and M. Fainsod, How the Soviet Union is Governed, p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Yu. Shmidt, ‘Problema nauchnykh kadrov’, Vestnik Kommunisticheskoi Akademii, kniga 37–8 (1930) p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. V. Chutkerashvili, Kadry dlya nauki (Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1968) p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. D. Komkov, B. V. Levshin and E. K. Semenov, Akademiya nauk SSSR (Moscow: Nauka, 1974) p. 462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Peter Kneen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kneen, P. (1984). Natural Scientists and the Communist Party: Structure, Functions and Membership. In: Soviet Scientists and the State. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07332-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07332-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07334-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07332-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics