Skip to main content

The Utopic Stage

  • Chapter
Utopics: Spatial Play
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

Utopia is a discourse. Better yet, it is a book or volume of signs disposed in a certain order. These signs owe their meaning to a system of which the book is one among an infinite number of possible realizations. In this volume are found sentences, words, and letters that realize, through their differential values, meaning. This definition is true for any book, process, or text. The differential nature of utopia is of a stylistic nature. It is based on a typology of genres that another syntax orders. With Thomas More’s Utopia as an example, I have noticed that utopia, through its multiple and varied literary spatial play (historical narrative, travel narrative, description, illustrating narratives, etc.), is the textual place of production of a representative figure, of a picture within the text whose function consists in dissimulating, within its metaphor, historical contradiction — historical narrative — by projecting it onto a screen. It stages it as a representation by articulating it in the form of a structure of harmonious and immobile equilibrium. By its pure representability it totalizer the differences that the narrative of history develops dynamically. This representation is the project of a utopic practice that keeps inside of itself traces whose critical force remains in a neutralized area of historical contradiction, making possible the constitution of the figure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See A. Green, Un oeil en trop ( Paris: Minuit, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. With reference to this, see the work of W. J. Ong, especially his book on Ramus: Method and the Decay of Dialogue ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J-P. Vernant and P. Vidal-Naquet, Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ( Paris: Maspero, 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vernant, pp. 23–24. See also J. H. Finley, Pindarus and Aeschylus (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. David M. Bevington deals with this subject in “Dialogue in Utopia: Two Sides of the Question”, Studies in Philology, 58 (July, 1961 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robert E. Elliott’s work is essential: The Shape of Utopia (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970). See also his previous book The Power of Satire: Magic Ritual, Art (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mikhail Bakhtine, Problems of Dostoevski’s Poetics ( Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. W. Chambers, Thomas More (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1935). See also Marie Delcourt’s introduction to her French translation of Utopia (Brussels, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cyrano de Bergerac, L’Autre Monde ou les Etats et Empires de la Lune Introduction by M. Langaa (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1970), pp. 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Ernst Bloch, Thomas Münzer als Theologe der Revolution (Suhrkamp Verlag, 1964), Gesamtansgabe, Bd. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Humanities Press Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marin, L. (1984). The Utopic Stage. In: Utopics: Spatial Play. Contemporary Studies in Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07329-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics