Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic and Social History ((SESH))

  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

THE extent of the economic loss or gain which a country can expect from any war is not only determined by the hazard of battle. A country can and should try to control the economic outcome through the strategy with which it chooses to pursue the war. Consider the case before 1914 of a small, highly industrialised island with an insignificant agricultural sector faced with the possibility of a war against a larger, equally industrialised and agriculturally more self-sufficient economy. The advantage of the island lay in its higher level of output and wealth per head, representing both a higher level of productivity (although mainly in the agricultural sector) and a greater and more profitable involvement in international trade and investment. This advantage depended, however, on the ability of the island to continue to earn even in wartime conditions the wherewithal to pay for the imports which sustained its economy, which meant continuing to play a major role in the international trade and payments network from which its superior levels of national income were in part derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 The Economic History Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milward, A.S. (1984). The International Impact. In: The Economic Effects of the Two World Wars on Britain. Studies in Economic and Social History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07300-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics