Abstract
Economists understand technology less deeply than some might hope. But they understand the world of technology far better than they do the world of science (see, for example, Rosenberg, 1982, especially chapter 7). Kenneth Arrow’s famous 1962 essay, and the literature it inspired, is in good part to blame for this state of affairs. In ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions’, Arrow laid the foundations for modern economic analysis of research and development (R&D) activities. On that base, a large, and impressive edifice of research devoted to the economics of technological invention and innovation has since been erected. By absolute as well as comparative standards, the economics of science has remained lamentably underdeveloped. That too is traceable to the 1962 essay.
This essay owes much to the many conversations that each of us has held over the years with Kenneth Arrow. Among these we can pleasurably recall pertinent discussions of economics of information, allocation of resources to the scientific research, and the organization of communities of academic scientists. Although these pages are offered in his honour, and we would ourselves be honoured to have them accepted as an extension of the line of thought represented by his seminal 1962 paper on the allocation of resources for inventions, Arrow himself must not be blamed for the views expressed herein.
A first draft was prepared while Dasgupta was a Visiting Fellow at the Center for Economic Policy Research at Stanford University during the summer of 1984. The present version has benefited from the comments and suggestions made by Bengt Lundvall, R. C. O. Matthews, Roger Noll, Jean-Jacques Salomon, Walter G. Vincenti, and participants in the Technological Innovation Program Workshop in the Department of Economics at Stanford University during Fall Quarter, 1984. Joshua Rosenbloom provided able research assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1962) ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Priceton: Princeton University Press).
Boorstin, D. (1984) The Discoverers: A History of Man’s Search to Know His World and Himself (New York: Random House).
Braun, E. and S. MacDonald (1978) Revolution in Miniature: The History and Impact of Semiconductor Electronics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Brooks, H. (1967) ‘Applied Research: Definitions, Concepts, Themes’, in US Congress, House Committee on Science and Astronautics, Subcommittee on Science, Research and Development, Applied Science and Technological Progress (Washington, DC: USGPO).
Dasgupta, P. (1985) ‘The Theory of Technological Competition’, in J. Stiglitz and F. Mathewson (eds) New Developments in the Theory of Market Structure (London: Macmillan Press) and (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Dasgupta, P. and E. Maskin (1985) ‘The Economics of R and D Portfolios’ mimeo. (Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge).
Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz (1980a) ‘Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity’, Economic Journal, 90: 266–93.
Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz (1980b) ‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure and the Speed of R and D’, Bell Journal of Economics, 11: 1–28.
Hirshleifer, J. (1971) ‘The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward for Inventive Activity’, American Economic Review, 61: 561–74.
Klein, B. H. (1962) ‘The Decision Making Problem in Development’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Lakatos, I. (1980), in J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Levin, R. (1982) ‘The Semiconductor Industry’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.) Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis (New York: Pergamon Press).
Mansfield, E. et al. (1982) Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy (New York: Norton).
Medawar, S. (1982) Plato’s Republic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Merton, R. K. (1957) ‘Priorities in Scientific Discovery’, American Sociological Review, 22: 635–59.
Merton, R. K. (1973) in N. W. Starer (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Mowery, D. (1983) ‘Economic Theory and Government Technology Policy’, Policy Sciences, 16: 27–43.
Nelson, R. R. (1962) ‘The Link Between Science and Invention: The Case of the Transistor’, in R. R. Nelson (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (A Conference of the Universities’ National Bureau Committee for Economic Research) (Princeton: Princeton University Press) pp. 549–83.
Price, D. J. de S. (1967) ‘Research on Research’, in D. L. Arm (ed.) Journeys in Science: Small Steps-Great Strides, (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press).
Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (New York: Cambridge University Press) (especially chapter 7-‘How Exogenous is Science?’).
Salomon, J. -J. (1973) Science and Politics, translated by N. Lindsay (London: Macmillan Press).
Scherer, F. M. (1984) Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Taylor, C. and Z. A. Silberston (1973) The Economic Impact of the Patent System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Vincenti, W. G. (1985) ‘The Davis Wing and the Problem of Airfoil Design: Uncertainty and Growth in Engineering Knowledge’, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University School of Engineering (Winter).
Wilson, R. (1975) ‘Informational Economics of Scale’, Bell Journal of Economics, 6: 184–95.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1987 George R. Feiwel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dasgupta, P., David, P.A. (1987). Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07239-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07239-2_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07241-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07239-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)