Skip to main content

Codebreakers and Foreign Offices: The French, British and American Experience

  • Chapter
The Missing Dimension

Abstract

LIKE other major foreign ministries, the Quai d’Orsay, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the State Department nowadays receive much of their most valuable intelligence from cryptanalysts: from the Groupement des Contrôles Radio-électriques in France, from the Government Communications Headquarters in Britain, and from the National Security Agency in the United States. The historical origins of these three secret agencies are very different. In France there is an almost continuous history of diplomatic codebreaking stretching back to the cabinet noir founded by Cardinal Richelieu. In Britain the Foreign Office inherited an official ‘decypherer on its foundation in 1782 but abolished the post in 1844 and abandoned codebreaking altogether for the next seventy years. The United States lived in a state of cryptographic innocence until its entry into the First World War prompted the creation of its first ‘Black Chamber’ (so named in honour of the French original). Despite these national differences, however, there are three striking similarities in the twentieth-century experience of diplomatic codebreaking in France, Britain and the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Reference

  1. O. Homberg, Les coulisses de lhistoire (Paris, 1938), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. M. Andrew, ‘Déchiffrement et diplomatie: le cabinet noir du Quai d’Orsay sous la Troisième République’, Relations Internationales (1976), no. 5, 44 ff

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.; H. Guillemin, ‘L’affaire Dreyfus. Le télégramme du 2 novembre’, Mercure de France, CCCXXXIX (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. M. Andrew, Théophile Delcassé and the Making of the Entente Cordiale (London, 1968), pp. 98–100, also ‘Déchiffrement et diplomatie’, pp. 48–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Haverna, ‘Note sur l’organisation et le fonctionnement du service cryptographique de la Sûreté Générale’, 7 Sept 1917, Archives Nationales, F7 14,605.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Poincaré, ‘Notes journalières’, 16 Jan 1914, Bibliothèque Nationale cabinet des manuscrits (hereafter BN), n.a. fr. 16026.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ferry, Les carnets secrets 1914–1918 (Paris, 1957), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew, Delcassé, chapter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Chastenet, Histoire de la Troisième Republique, vol. IV (Paris, 1955), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rayner Heppenstall, A Little Pattern of French Crime (London, 1969), pp. 149–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ramm (ed.), The Political Correspondence of Mr Gladstone and Lord Granville, 1876–1886, vol. II (Oxford, 1962), pp. 33–5. Monson to Lansdowne, 21 Feb 1902, PRO FO 800/124.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. M. Andrew, ‘The British Secret Service and Anglo-Soviet Relations in the 1920s, Part I’, Historical Journal, xx (1977), 678–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The best study of naval codebreaking is in Patrick Beesly, Room 40 (London, 1982). On the broader context see C. M. Andrew, ‘The mobilization of British Intelligence for the Two World Wars’, in N. F. Dreisziger (ed.), Mobilization for Total War (Waterloo, Ontario, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Denniston, MS memoir on Room 40, n.d., Churchill College Archives Centre, Cambridge, Denniston MSS. Oliver to Admiralty, 7 March 1919; Oliver, ‘Notes About Room 40 and Sir Alfred Ewing in the 1914–18 War’, National Maritime Museum, Oliver MSS OLV/8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. H. Hinsley et al., British Intelligence in the Second World War, vol. I (London, 1979), pp. 9–10. On the Zimmermann telegram see below, p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrew, ‘The British Secret Service … Part I’, pp. 683–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., pp. 692–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. M. Andrew, ‘British Intelligence and the Breach with Russia in 1927’, Historical Journal, xxv, no. 4 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christopher Morris, Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, interviewed by Christopher Andrew on ‘Timewatch’, BBC2, 15 Dec 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew, ‘The British Secret Service … Part I’, p. 686.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herbert Yardley, The American Black Chamber (New York 1931), p. 21

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. F. Friedman, ‘A Brief History of the Signal Intelligence Service’, pp. 9–10, 29 June 1942, National Archives RG 457–SRH–029.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Lewin, The Other Ultra (London, 1982), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Bamford, The Puzzle Palace (Boston, Mass., 1982), pp. 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ‘Historical Background of the Signal Security Agency’, vol. III, pp. 169–70. Lewin, Other Ultra, p. 38. The SIS began work in 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman, ‘Brief History’, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewin, Other Ultra, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman, ‘Brief History’, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bamford, Puzzle Palace, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Christopher Andrew David Dilks

Copyright information

© 1984 Christopher Andrew, Robert Cecil, David Dilks, David Kahn, Ian Nish, Eunan O’Halpin, Alasdair Palmer, Harry Howe Ransom, Jürgen Rohwer, Jean Stengers, Wesley K. Wark

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrew, C. (1984). Codebreakers and Foreign Offices: The French, British and American Experience. In: Andrew, C., Dilks, D. (eds) The Missing Dimension. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07234-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics