Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series ((STANTS))

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

As illustrated, labour surpluses, especially among the indigenous Central Asians, may be a growing problem in Uzbekistan. Perhaps a greater problem, however, is the fact that the different nationalities working in social production differ sharply in the sector and location of their employment. Despite efforts to industrialise Uzbekistan and to bring the indigenous nationalities into the industrial labour force, the indigenous Central Asians still predominate in agriculture and the service sphere, while heavy industry and construction have been developed mainly by non-indigenous personnel. Despite efforts to urbanise the indigenous populations, Central Asians remain largely rural or in the older, smaller towns where industry is poorly developed; the inhabitants of new cities, where industrial development and capital investment have been highest, are largely European. While Uzbekistan’s economy has been dramatically transformed during the twentieth century, therefore, the traditional sectoral and locational divisions by nationality have been slower to change, and in many respects remain in force today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See E. Bacon, Central Asians Under Russian Rule (New York: Cornell University Press, 1966) p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Caroe, The Soviet Empire (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1967) passim

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iu. Bromlei, Sovremennye etnicheskiie protsessy v SSSR, (Moscow: Nauka, 1977) p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. A. Pierce, Russian Central Asia: 1867–1917(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960) p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curzon, Russia in Central Asia in 1889 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1889).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For an excellent discussion of the place of women in pre-Revolutionary and immediately post-Revolutionary Uzbekistan, see G. Massell, The Surrogate Proletariat (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974). passim.

    Google Scholar 

  7. From 1928 to 1935, fifty new industrial enterprises were brought into production in Uzbekistan, with a total staff of about 20 900 people. From 1933 to 1935 alone, however, more than 10 500 of these workers had been sent to Uzbekistan from the RSFSR. See I. E. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy vosproizvodstva rabochei sily v Uzbekistane (Tashkent: Fan, 1976) p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Between 1929–1933, the number and proportion of natives in Uzbekistan’s Communist Party increased rapidly, reaching a peak of 70 per cent of total membership in 1934. Between 1934 and 1938, the number and proportion of natives in the Party declined equally rapidly, as did the size of the Party as a whole. See D. Carlisle, ‘Modernization, Generations and the Uzbek Soviet Intelligentsia’, The Dynamics of Soviet Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976) p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See TsSU Narodnoe khoziaistvo Uzbekistana za 60 let (Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1977) p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See S. Rapawy, ‘Regional Employment Trends in the USSR: 1950–1975’, The Soviet Economy in a Time of Change, compendium of papers submitted to the Joint Economic Committee, US Congress, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979), vol. 1. Computed from his tables, pp. 604–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See, for example, J. H. Miller, ‘Cadres Policy in Nationality Areas,’ Soviet Studies, vol. xxix, no. 1, January 1977, passim. This pattern is true for almost all the republics in the USSR. See also S. Paczolt, ‘Soviet Nationalities Policy and Oblast’ Political Elites in Soviet Kazakhstan, Transcaucasia and Central Asia’, doctoral dissertation, Maryland, 1975, passim. In 1981, of the two oblast’ first secretaries who were European, each had a native second secretary. See I. Selnick, ‘The Ethno-Political Determinants…’, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See R. Kh. Aminova, ‘Protiv burzhuaznoi fal’sifikatsii industrial’nogo razvitiia sovetskogo Uzbekistana’, Obshchestvennye nauki v Uzbekistane, no. 9, 1975, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Among women, the rise was from 9.4 to 13.5 per cent; among men, the proportion working in industry rose only 0.2 per cent, from 21.8 to 22.0 per cent. See G. A. Shister, Promyshlennye rabochie Uzbekistana (Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1975) p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. B. Ata Mirzaev, ‘Voprosy vzaimodeistviia urbanizatsii i migratsii naseleniia’, Voprosy geografii respublik Srednei Azii (Tashkent: Minvuz, 1975) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. As Egamberdyev writes, ‘the creation of national cadres in industry still remains one of the little-solved and at the same time particularly important problems in reproducing the total labour force in the republics of Central Asia and Kazakhstan’. See A. Egamberdyev, Vosproizvodstva trudovykh resursov sel’skoi mestnosti Uzbekistana i osnovnye puti uluchsheniia ikh ispol’zovaniia (Tashkent: Fan, 1972) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See V. G. Kostakov, Trudovye resursy: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskii analiz (Moscow: Ekonomika, 1976) p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Maksakova, ‘Problemy ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniia trudovykh resursov Uzbekistana’, Aktual ’nye problemy povysheniia kachestva produktsii, proizvoditel’nosti truda i effektivnosti proizvodstva, (materialy nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii), (Tashkent: ‘Fan’ 1976), p. 64. Taken from a sociological study of new industrial enterprises carried out by the planning sector for the use of labour resources, NIEI, Gosplan UzSSR in 1976, under the direction of Maksakova.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See V. Mikheeva, ‘Trudovye resursy malykh i srednikh gorodov Uzbekistana i perspektivy ikh ispol’zovaniia’, doctoral dissertation, Tashkent, 1975, pp.12–13. See also R. A. Ubaidullaeva, ‘Regional’nye problem razmeshcheniia…’, p. 323 and A. V. Khisamov, Ekonomicheskaia geografia Uzbekskoi SSR (Tashkent: Ukituvchi, 1978) pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Satvaldyev, ‘Voprosy sovershenstvovaniia otraslevoi struktury zaniatosti naseleniia v Uzbekistane’, Razvitie i razmeshchenie proizvoditel’nykh sil i ispol’zovaniie trudovykh resursov (Tashkent: monograph prepared by Gosplan, UzSSR and NIEI, 1977) p. 39. Confirmed in interview in 1979 with Y. T. Zakirov, Deputy Chairman, State Committee on Labour and Social Problems, UzSSR, who told me that the disproportion in the choice of profession by nationality ‘is mainly due to the location of different industries’.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See R. Lewis, Regional Manpower Resources and Resource Development in the USSR: 1970–1990, discussion paper no. 18 (Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, December 1979) p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. E. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy… 1976, p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. B. Fedorova, ‘Tekhnicheskii progress i kachestvennyi sostav rabochikh kadrov’, Iangi Tekhnika, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy… 1976, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. O. B. Ata-Mirzaev, ‘Voprosy vzaimodeistviia urbanizatsii…’, Voprosy geografii respublik Srednei Azii (Tashkent: Minvuz, 1975) p. 39 and Ata Mirzaev, Naselenie Uzbekistana’ (Tashkent, k pomoshch’ lektoru November 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Nancy Lubin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lubin, N. (1984). The Use of Labour by Sector and Location. In: Labour and Nationality in Soviet Central Asia. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07204-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07204-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07206-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07204-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics