Abstract
As illustrated, labour surpluses, especially among the indigenous Central Asians, may be a growing problem in Uzbekistan. Perhaps a greater problem, however, is the fact that the different nationalities working in social production differ sharply in the sector and location of their employment. Despite efforts to industrialise Uzbekistan and to bring the indigenous nationalities into the industrial labour force, the indigenous Central Asians still predominate in agriculture and the service sphere, while heavy industry and construction have been developed mainly by non-indigenous personnel. Despite efforts to urbanise the indigenous populations, Central Asians remain largely rural or in the older, smaller towns where industry is poorly developed; the inhabitants of new cities, where industrial development and capital investment have been highest, are largely European. While Uzbekistan’s economy has been dramatically transformed during the twentieth century, therefore, the traditional sectoral and locational divisions by nationality have been slower to change, and in many respects remain in force today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See E. Bacon, Central Asians Under Russian Rule (New York: Cornell University Press, 1966) p. 106.
O. Caroe, The Soviet Empire (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1967) passim
Iu. Bromlei, Sovremennye etnicheskiie protsessy v SSSR, (Moscow: Nauka, 1977) p. 127.
R. A. Pierce, Russian Central Asia: 1867–1917(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960) p. 102.
Curzon, Russia in Central Asia in 1889 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1889).
For an excellent discussion of the place of women in pre-Revolutionary and immediately post-Revolutionary Uzbekistan, see G. Massell, The Surrogate Proletariat (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974). passim.
From 1928 to 1935, fifty new industrial enterprises were brought into production in Uzbekistan, with a total staff of about 20 900 people. From 1933 to 1935 alone, however, more than 10 500 of these workers had been sent to Uzbekistan from the RSFSR. See I. E. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy vosproizvodstva rabochei sily v Uzbekistane (Tashkent: Fan, 1976) p. 155.
Between 1929–1933, the number and proportion of natives in Uzbekistan’s Communist Party increased rapidly, reaching a peak of 70 per cent of total membership in 1934. Between 1934 and 1938, the number and proportion of natives in the Party declined equally rapidly, as did the size of the Party as a whole. See D. Carlisle, ‘Modernization, Generations and the Uzbek Soviet Intelligentsia’, The Dynamics of Soviet Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976) p. 258.
See TsSU Narodnoe khoziaistvo Uzbekistana za 60 let (Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1977) p. 205.
See S. Rapawy, ‘Regional Employment Trends in the USSR: 1950–1975’, The Soviet Economy in a Time of Change, compendium of papers submitted to the Joint Economic Committee, US Congress, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979), vol. 1. Computed from his tables, pp. 604–13.
See, for example, J. H. Miller, ‘Cadres Policy in Nationality Areas,’ Soviet Studies, vol. xxix, no. 1, January 1977, passim. This pattern is true for almost all the republics in the USSR. See also S. Paczolt, ‘Soviet Nationalities Policy and Oblast’ Political Elites in Soviet Kazakhstan, Transcaucasia and Central Asia’, doctoral dissertation, Maryland, 1975, passim. In 1981, of the two oblast’ first secretaries who were European, each had a native second secretary. See I. Selnick, ‘The Ethno-Political Determinants…’, passim.
See R. Kh. Aminova, ‘Protiv burzhuaznoi fal’sifikatsii industrial’nogo razvitiia sovetskogo Uzbekistana’, Obshchestvennye nauki v Uzbekistane, no. 9, 1975, p. 17.
Among women, the rise was from 9.4 to 13.5 per cent; among men, the proportion working in industry rose only 0.2 per cent, from 21.8 to 22.0 per cent. See G. A. Shister, Promyshlennye rabochie Uzbekistana (Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1975) p. 80.
O. B. Ata Mirzaev, ‘Voprosy vzaimodeistviia urbanizatsii i migratsii naseleniia’, Voprosy geografii respublik Srednei Azii (Tashkent: Minvuz, 1975) p. 39.
As Egamberdyev writes, ‘the creation of national cadres in industry still remains one of the little-solved and at the same time particularly important problems in reproducing the total labour force in the republics of Central Asia and Kazakhstan’. See A. Egamberdyev, Vosproizvodstva trudovykh resursov sel’skoi mestnosti Uzbekistana i osnovnye puti uluchsheniia ikh ispol’zovaniia (Tashkent: Fan, 1972) p. 14.
See V. G. Kostakov, Trudovye resursy: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskii analiz (Moscow: Ekonomika, 1976) p. 156.
L. Maksakova, ‘Problemy ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniia trudovykh resursov Uzbekistana’, Aktual ’nye problemy povysheniia kachestva produktsii, proizvoditel’nosti truda i effektivnosti proizvodstva, (materialy nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii), (Tashkent: ‘Fan’ 1976), p. 64. Taken from a sociological study of new industrial enterprises carried out by the planning sector for the use of labour resources, NIEI, Gosplan UzSSR in 1976, under the direction of Maksakova.
See V. Mikheeva, ‘Trudovye resursy malykh i srednikh gorodov Uzbekistana i perspektivy ikh ispol’zovaniia’, doctoral dissertation, Tashkent, 1975, pp.12–13. See also R. A. Ubaidullaeva, ‘Regional’nye problem razmeshcheniia…’, p. 323 and A. V. Khisamov, Ekonomicheskaia geografia Uzbekskoi SSR (Tashkent: Ukituvchi, 1978) pp. 13–15.
B. Satvaldyev, ‘Voprosy sovershenstvovaniia otraslevoi struktury zaniatosti naseleniia v Uzbekistane’, Razvitie i razmeshchenie proizvoditel’nykh sil i ispol’zovaniie trudovykh resursov (Tashkent: monograph prepared by Gosplan, UzSSR and NIEI, 1977) p. 39. Confirmed in interview in 1979 with Y. T. Zakirov, Deputy Chairman, State Committee on Labour and Social Problems, UzSSR, who told me that the disproportion in the choice of profession by nationality ‘is mainly due to the location of different industries’.
See R. Lewis, Regional Manpower Resources and Resource Development in the USSR: 1970–1990, discussion paper no. 18 (Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, December 1979) p. 52.
A. E. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy… 1976, p. 96.
A. B. Fedorova, ‘Tekhnicheskii progress i kachestvennyi sostav rabochikh kadrov’, Iangi Tekhnika, 1975.
A. Egamberdyev, Regional’nye problemy… 1976, p. 33.
O. B. Ata-Mirzaev, ‘Voprosy vzaimodeistviia urbanizatsii…’, Voprosy geografii respublik Srednei Azii (Tashkent: Minvuz, 1975) p. 39 and Ata Mirzaev, Naselenie Uzbekistana’ (Tashkent, k pomoshch’ lektoru November 1978).
Copyright information
© 1984 Nancy Lubin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lubin, N. (1984). The Use of Labour by Sector and Location. In: Labour and Nationality in Soviet Central Asia. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07204-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07204-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07206-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07204-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)