Abstract
Chapter 6 examined the Symbolist beliefs which pervade Pound’s pre-Imagist poetry. My aim in this chapter is to emphasise the essential continuity of these throughout Pound’s Imagist/Vorticist period, despite superficial changes in the vocabulary in which they were expressed. I shall conclude by considering the relationship between Pound’s poetry and that of the other Imagists and adumbrate the future development of Imagism into Objectivist poetry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, comments by Edward Thomas, Rupert Brooke and J. C. Squire, repr. in Ezra Pound: The Critical Heritage, ed. Eric Homberger (London and Boston, Mass., 1972) 50–3, 58–9, 83–4.
Cf., for example, Pound’s Spirit of Romance, 25, 126, Selected Prose, 28–9, 41, 42, and Literay Essays, 11–12, with Hulme, FS, 5, 9–14, 74–5. A detailed argument for Hulme’s influence on Pound is provided in my D Phil thesis, ‘The Transition from Symbolism to Imagism, 1885–1914’ (Oxford, 1982) 326–34.
Pound, Translations, 23.
Cf. Pound, Literay Essays, 4.
See G. T. Tanselle, ‘Two Early Letters of Ezra Pound’, American Literature, 34 (1962–3) 116 (emphasis added); Pound, Translations, 24.
On Daniel see Pound: Selected Prose, 26–8; and Literay Essays, 112, 114, 115–16.
Selected Prose, 41. Pound is echoing Symons’s criticism of Browning’s partial grasp ‘that verse must be like speech, without realising that it must be like dignified speech.’; see ‘Mr W. B. Yeats’, Studies in Prose and Verse (1904) 238, cf. 237. On Pound’s high esteem in 1911 for Symons’s criticism, see Tanselle, ‘Two Early Letters of Pound’, American Literature, 34, p. 118.
See Pound, Literay Essays, 49, 51–4.
Repr. from Poety Review, Feb 1912, in Literay Essays, 9–12; see particularly 9.
Literary Essays, 5; cf. Letters, 90–1.
Herbert N. Schneidau, ‘Pound and Yeats: The Question of Symbolism’, ELH, XXXII (1965) 231, 232.
Ibid., 236. Cf. Ronald Bush, The Genesis of Ezra Pound’s Cantos (Princeton, NJ, 1976), 104.
Pound, ‘The Book of the Month’, Poety Review, I (Mar 1912) 133.
For an alternative discussion of Pound’s views on literary impressionism, see Hugh Witemeyer, The Poetry of Ezra Pound: Forms and Renewal, 1908–1920 (Berkeley, Calif., and Los Angeles, 1969) 176–83.
Pound, ‘On Criticism in General’, Criterion, I (Jan 1923) 144–6; quotations from 146.
Ford Madox Ford, ‘On Impressionism’, Poetry and Drama, II, (June, Dec 1914) 174, 323. Cf. his ‘Joseph Conrad’, English Review, X (Dec 1911) 76, 77. See also Herbert N. Schneidau, Ezra Pound: The Image and the Real (Baton Rouge, La., 1969) 26–7.
Richard Aldington, ‘M. Marinetti’s Lectures’, New Freewoman, I (1Dec 1913) 226; cf. his distinction between impressionism and impersonal ‘presentation’ in ‘Books, Drawings, and Papers’, Egoist, I (1 Jan 1914) 10; and his satire on Ford, ‘Vates, the Social Reformer’, in Des Imagistes (1914) 59–61.
Ford Madox Ford, Collected Poems (1914) 15–19 (quotation from 15). Cf. Pound, Gaudier-Brzeska, 86–7.
See Literay Essays, 4; and Early Poems, 171 (emphasis added).
Selected Prose, 402; Gaudier-Brzeska, 89.
Poety, IV (June 1914) 120.
Ford Madox Ford: Return to Yesterday (New York, 1932) 400–1; ‘Literary Portraits-XXXIII: Mr Sturge Moore and “The Sea is Kind”’, Outlook, XXXIII (25 Apr 1914) 560; ‘Literary Portraits-XXXV: Les Jeunes and “Des Imagistes”’, Outlook, XXXIII (9 May 1914) 636, 653; ‘Literary Portraits-XLIII: Mr Wyndham Lewis and “Blast”’, Outlook, XXXIV (4 July 1914) 15–16; ‘Those Were the Days’, Preface to Imagist Anthology 1930 (1930) ix–xvi.
Ford, ‘Literary Portraits-XXXV’, Outlook, XXXIII, 636. Ford’s garbled eclecticism also echoes Pound in a parallel of the ‘abstract beauty’ of Imagist poetry with music (ibid., 653). Cf. M. T. H. Sadler’s Introduction to his translation of Wassily Kandinsky, The Art of Spiritual Harmony (1914) x, xvii; Roger Fry, ‘Art. The Post-Impressionists. - II’, Nation, VIII (1910–11) 403, who memorably discusses van Gogh as a visionary who painted the ‘soul’ of people and things in a ‘deep submission to their essence’; and Ramiro de Maeztu, ‘Expressionism’, New Age, XIV (27 Nov 1913), quoted supra, pp. 139–40.
Ford Madox Ford, ‘Literary Portraits - XXXVI: Les Jeunes and “Des Imagistes” (Second Notice)’, Outlook, XXXIII (16 May 1914) 682. Cf. the whole of Kandinsky’s introductory chapter in The Art of Spiritual Harmony, particularly his stress on the ‘non-material’ on 29–30, 40.
Ford, ‘Literary Portraits - XXXVI’, Outlook, XXXIII, 682. He insisted elsewhere that the Futurists paralleled on canvas his own literary endeavours and that he had been preaching Marinetti’s doctrines since he was fifteen. Further similarities lay, he maintained with a characteristically light-hearted gibe at Pound, in their common concentration on rendering present-day life, not the Troubadours or Albigensians. See his ‘On Impressionism’, Poetry and Drama, II, 175; ‘Literary Portraits - XLIV: Signor Marinetti, Mr Lloyd George, St Katharine, and Others’, Outlook, XXXIV (11 July 1914) 46–7.
Ford, ‘Literary Portraits - XXXVI’, Outlook, XXXIII, 682; cf. Michael Sadler, ‘After Gauguin’, Rhythm, I . 4 (Spring 1912) 23–9 (quoted supra, p. 139).
Pound, ‘Vorticism’ (Sep 1914), repr. in Gaudier-Brzeska, 92.
Ibid., 89–90 (quotation from 90).
‘Vortex. Pound’, Blast, I (20 June 1914) 154; unpublished letter from Pound to Harriet Monroe, 7 Aug 1914, quoted in J. B. Harmer, Victory in Limbo: Imagism 1908–1917 (1975) 178; Gaudier-Brzeska, 81. Witemeyer, in ch. 2 of The Poetry of Pound, particularly 32–7, has also stressed most persuasively the essential continuity between Imagism and Vorticism, as has, from a different approach, Thomas H. Jackson in The Early Poetry of Ezra Pound, (Cambridge, Mass., 1968) 96–108.
Pound: ‘The New Sculpture’, Egoist, I (16 Feb 1914) 67–8; ‘Exhibition at the Goupil Gallery’, Egoist, I (16 Mar 1914) 109 (cf. Letters, 74). Yeats, Uncollected Prose, II, 134.
Pound/Joyce, 26. Cf. Pound, Pavannes and Divisions (New York, 1918) 245–6.
William C. Wees, ‘Ezra Pound as a Vorticist’, Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature, VI (1965) 71–2, referring to Gaudier-Brzeska, 120–1. Cf. Hugh Kenner, The Poetry of Ezra Pound (1951) 73–5; and Donald Davie, Ezra Pound: Poet as Sculptor (1965) 54–5.
Pound: ‘Affirmations… II. Vorticism’, New Age, XVI (14 Jan 1915) 277, 278; Gaudier-Brzeska, 121, 127; ‘The Caressability of the Greeks’ (letter), Egoist, I (16 March 1914) 117; ‘Vortex. Pound’, Blast, I, 154; Selected Prose, 346–7.
Gaudier-Brzeska, 126; ‘Affirmations… II. Vorticism’, New Age, XVI, 278.
Gaudier-Brzeska, 121–2 (emphasis added).
‘Affirmations… II. Vorticism’, New Age, XVI, 277; cf. ‘Wyndham Lewis’, Egoist, I (15 June 1914) 233.
‘Wyndham Lewis’, Egoist, I, 233.
See ‘Affirmations… II. Vorticism’, New Age, XVI, 277, 278; and Selected Prose, 344–5.
See Literary Essays, 49, 52.
On Fenollosa’s Romantic organicism and theory of language as process, see The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry, ed. Ezra Pound (1936) 13,
14, 15–16, 19, 21, 23. Kenner has an excellent, suggestive account of Fenollosa’s lasting impact on Pound in The Pound Era, paperback edn (Berkeley, Calif., and Los Angeles, 1973) 157–61, 192–231, 289–91.
Cf. Pound: ‘Vortex. Pound’, Blast, I, 153–4; ‘Affirmations… III. Jacob Epstein’ (1915) and ‘Affirmations… V. Gaudier-Brzeska’ (1915), repr. in Gaudier-Brzeska, 98, 109, 110.
See ibid., 84; and Letters, 210 (emphasis added).
For an alternative interpretation see Wallace Martin, ‘The Sources of the Imagist Aesthetic’, PMLA, 85 (1970) 201.
See Yeats, Essays and Introductions, 161. N. Christoph de Nagy, in Ezra Pound’s Poetics and Literary Tradition: The Critical Decade (Bern, 1966) 82–3, also makes my general point, although with an inadequate account of Symbolist technique, while his rigid dichotomy between Imagism as phanopoeia and Symbolism as melopoeia totally falsifies Pound’s position in its neglect of the importance of ‘rhythm’ and melos.
Pound, Gaudier-Brzeska, 85.
Ibid., 85–6; cf. 92. See Whistler’s comments in The Gentle Art of Making Enemies 2nd, enlarged edn (1892; repr. New York, 1967) 126–8, 146–8. On programme music see Kandinsky, The Art of Spiritual Harmony, 42; Pound’s comments on this subject in Literay Essays, 433–4, probably derive from Nietzsche’s ‘Der Fall Wagner’, WdB, II, 912–16, 919–20, 923–5.
Pound, Gaudier-Brzeska, 90–2.
Ibid., 91–2. Cf. ibid., 87 and 88, on the ‘equation’ of colours, which was Pound’s first intuitive expression of the emotional experience underlying ‘In a Station of the Metro’.
Ibid., 127 (emphasis added); see also 134. Cf. ‘On the American Number’, Little Review, V (Sep 1918) 62; ‘Art Notes’ [signed ‘B. H. Dias’], New Age, XXVI (6 Nov 1919) 13; and the Neoplatonic interpretation of Epstein’s sculpture in ‘Exhibition at the Goupil Gallery’, Egoist, I (16 Mar 1914) 109.
Selected Prose, 346–7.
Guide to Kulchur, 152. See also ‘Through Alien Eyes, I’, New Age, XII (16 Jan 1913) 252; ‘Affirmations… II. Vorticism’, New Age, XVI, 277; Literay Essays, 154; Selected Prose, 346.
The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot (1969) 175.
Literay Essays, 442. For a good exposition of this profoundly traditional symbolism see Giorgio Melchiori, The Whole Mystey of Art (1961; repr. Westport, Conn., 1979), ch. 5, ‘The Mundane Egg’, 164–99.
Pound, Early Poems, 58; cf. Spirit of Romance, 68.
Early Poems, 72.
See Spirit of Romance, 158–9.
Early Poems, 114–15. For this quality see also ‘Portrait’ and ‘“Fair Helena” by Rackham’, ibid., 115–16.
See particularly ‘Canzon: The Spear’, ‘Canzon’ and ‘Canzon: Of Incense’, ibid., 134–9.
Ibid., 193, 194.
Ibid., 9–10; 83–5, 300–1; 198.
Repr. in Shorter Poems, 91–3, 94–5, 97–8, 101–5, 109, 111, 114, 124, 253; and Early Poems, 278, 279.
Shorter Poems, 99, 101, 120.
Ibid., 101. Cf. Selected Prose, 377–8; Shorter Poems, 209; ‘Three Cantos’, Poetry, X (June 1917) 116.
See Shorter Poems, 80, 85, 118.
Ibid., 119.
Cf. Pound’s early comment in Spirit of Romance, 31, on the ‘proper place’ of nature in poetry as ‘a background to the action, an interpretation of the mood; an equation, in other terms, or a “metaphor by sympathy” for the mood of the poem’.
Quotations from Donald Davie: ‘Pound and Eliot: a Distinction’, in Eliot in Perspective, ed. Graham Martin (1970) 62; and Pound (1975) 43. See also Davie, Pound: Poet as Sculptor, 57, 73–5; and Pound, 42–4.
Tony Tanner, The Reign of Wonder (New York, 1967) 91–2. Schneidau, in Pound: The Image and the Real, particularly 27–9, 83–4, 93, perceptively associates Pound’s ‘image’ with epiphanies and has some sensible comments on Symbolism. But I would disagree with his statement that the image is ‘a kind of secular revelation’ (28); I feel it was for Pound almost always mystical and spiritual. I also cannot agree with his praise along these lines of ‘The Garden’ (30–1), which I find an irredeemably weak poem.
Wallace Martin, ‘The Sources of the Imagist Aesthetic’, PMLA, 85 (1970) 204.
See The Collected Earlier Poems of William Carlos Williams (New York, 1966) 277, 96–7, 408, 449, 343.
See Louis Zukofsky, All: The Collected Short Poems 1956–64 (1967) 53–5; cf. ‘The Ways’, ibid., 88. Again this forms merely one mode in Zukofsky’s total œuvre, which is most obviously characterised by interest in the lyrical interplay of sounds.
Williams, Collected Earlier Poems, 142, 159, 241–2.
Ibid., 332.
Pound: Shorter Poems, 119; Gaudier-Brzeska, 85; letter to Homer L. Pound, 12 Oct 1916, quoted in Jackson, Early Poetry of Pound, 249.
Shorter Poems, 118, 119.
Ibid., 118; Witemeyer, Poetry of Pound, 142–3, prints Giles’s versions of this and of ‘Liu Ch’e’.
Shorter Poems, 118.
Ibid., 119.
Ibid., 131, 187.
Ibid., 171–7, 131–3.
Des Imagistes, 21–3.
Ibid., 28–9, 30, 20, 24–5, 26–7.
Some Imagist Poets: An Anthology (Boston, Mass., and New York, 1915) 21; Some Imagist Poets 1916: An Annual Anthology (Boston, Mass., and New York, 1916) 17–20, 21–5 (quotation from 23), 26–9.
Collected Poems of H.D. (New York, 1925) 52.
Some Imagist Poets, 24, 25–6, 27.
‘Choricos’, in Des Imagistes, 7–9. The same stricture applies to ‘Beauty Thou Hast Hurt Me Overmuch’ and ‘The River’ (ibid., 13, 16).
Ibid., 12, 10, 19, 14.
Ibid., 11.
The same comment could be applied to Flint’s Imagist version of ‘The Swan’ (ibid., 35), which subordinates the creature itself to a surrounding landscape which appears like a Symbolist painting.
‘The Poetry of F. S. Flint’, Egoist, II (1 May 1915) 80. In this respect compare Flint’s ‘London, my beautiful’, Des Imagistes, 31.
See ‘Trees’ and ‘Lunch’, Some Imagist Poets, 53–5; ‘Hallucination’, Des Imagistes, 32; ‘Accident’, Some Imagist Poets, 58–9; ‘Gloom’, Some Imagist Poets 1916, 57–9.
Untitled poem beginning ‘Immortal?… No’, Des Imagistes, 33. Cf. the different ending printed in ‘Three Poems’, Poetry and Drama, I (Sep 1913) 307.
Some Imagist Poets, 62. See also ‘Cones’, Some Imagist Poets, 1916, 56.
Eliot, Complete Poems and Plays, 22.
See Davie, Pound, 65ff.
Copyright information
© 1985 Alan David Robinson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, A. (1985). Imagism. In: Poetry, Painting and Ideas, 1885–1914. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07190-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07190-6_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07192-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07190-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)