Skip to main content

Domestic Consensus, Security and the Western Alliance

  • Chapter
Defence and Consensus
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

In an article entitled ‘Nato Myths’ (Foreign Policy, Winter 1981/82) Lawrence Freedman observes: ‘Whether a strategic doctrine is acceptable to the people for whom it has been developed is as important in an alliance of democratic societies as the doctrine’s ability to impress the enemy’. Democracy, in Freedman’s view, is crucial to defence ‘because in a real crisis public pressure will affect the implementation and success of any doctrine’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Christoph Bertram

Copyright information

© 1983 The International Institute for Strategic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biedenkopf, K. (1983). Domestic Consensus, Security and the Western Alliance. In: Bertram, C. (eds) Defence and Consensus. International Institute for Strategic Studies conference papers. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07141-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics