Skip to main content

International Economic Integration and Interdependence in the 1980s

  • Chapter
National Management of the International Economy
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

If international ‘openness’, ‘integration’ and ‘interdependence’ present conceptual problems, the difficulties associated with their measurement often seem to be almost insuperable. Given the sheer magnitude and complexity of the relationships involved in general economic integration (that is, integration covering a wide range of economic activities), no single measure employed to show the degree of integration appears to be entirely satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Cf. Dornbusch and Krugman (1976), OECD (1973). Both studies show export prices to be determined much more by domestic costs than by competitors’ prices, which is exactly what one would expect in a world of heterogeneous goods and services.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for instance, Kravis and Lipsey (1971, 1978), Isard (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Surveys of the relevant literature are provided by, among others, Aliber (1978), Argy (1981) and Llewellyn (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuznets (1966, p. 302).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also Kuznets (1964 and 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maizels (1963) includes an analysis of the characteristics of small countries’ trade.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The very high averages for Group III in the upper part of the table and Group V in the lower part are the result of Belgium’s exceptionally high trade ratio for 1979. Incidentally, of the countries included in Table 2.1 two — Libya and Saudi Arabia — are excluded because of the lack of comparable data.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page (1979, p. 166).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. See also the table on p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuznets (1964, p. 56).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The group of centrally planned economies in Table 2.4 includes USSR, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Rumania.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The table refers only to trade in goods. However, if similar data were available for services they would no doubt show very much the same picture, as this type of trade also tends to be determined predominantly by the level of economic development. Cf. Sapir and Lutz (1981). For an analysis of the difficulties which developing countries are experiencing in developing trade among themselves and their dependence on industrial countries see Havrylyshyn and Wolf (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Fortune (1972) on the important role which income equalisation plays in the growth of trade.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grubel and Lloyd (1975), Aquino (1978), Giersch (1979). See also Balassa (1986) for an attempt to quantify the relative importance of a number of factors in the development of intra-industry trade.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aquino (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. Kuznets (1964), Aquino (1978). It inevitably takes some time before developing countries reach the level of industrialisation which enables them to specialise in a wide range of products and production methods. At the same time, inter-industry trade may remain important for those industrial countries, such as Canada and Norway, which are rich in certain natural resources.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for instance, Scherer (1980), Prais (1976). The changes in industrial, national and international forms of organisation caused by technical advances are discussed in Part V.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Aquino (1978), Grubel and Lloyd (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuznets (1966). Sen (1984) contains a survey of the relevant empirical literature as well as an analysis of the reasons for these similarities.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for instance, Pryor (1972) and Hughes (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. According to Dunning (1981a, p. 436): ‘intra-industry and intra-firm direct investment tends to be greatest in the sectors in which [transnational corporations] possess the type of ownership advantages which is best exploited internally rather than by way of licensing, management contracts, franchise and technical service agreements etc’. He also found evidence that ‘patterns of direct investment may lag those of trade’ (ibid., p. 434).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Stopford, Dunning and Haberich (1980), United Nations (1978 and 1981), Stopford and Dunning (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See, for instance, Frobel, Heinrichs and Kreye (1980). There is certainly evidence that the industries in which transnationals are active show not only the highest levels of intra-industry international direct investment and trade but also the highest levels of intra-firm trade. Cf. Dunning and Pearce (1981), Dunning (1981a) and, particularly, Casson and Associates (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lack of relevant information makes it impossible to do more than speculate about this at the moment. Nevertheless, there is a fairly strong possibility that international integration in recent decades has been accompanied by a certain amount of economic disintegration within countries, as transnationals have altered the spatial distribution of their activities within and between countries.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Compare, for instance, indicators of the extent of intra-industry trade in different industries estimated by Grubel and Lloyd (1975) and Aquino (1978) with the data on intra-firm trade in Helleiner (1981) and Casson and Associates (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Batchelor, Major and Morgan (1980, pp. 90–91).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quoted in United Nations (1985, p. 117).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dunning and Pearce (1981, p. 132). See also Sen (1984, pp. 233–40) for a survey of the evidence on the importance of intra-firm trade in a number of countries.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cf. United Nations (1985, pp. 117–18).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quoted in Sen (1984, p. 236).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cf. Helleiner (1981, p. 28) from which this and the other figures in the paragraph were taken.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Panić and Joyce (1980) and Panić (1982) for an analysis of certain aspects of the UK’s experience in this respect.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Goldsmith (1969). Furthermore, with the exception of centrally planned economies, long-term financial developments in different countries follow broadly similar lines (Goldsmith, 1966). This finding is similar to the one made by Kuznets (1966), which showed the growing long-term similarity of different countries’ industrial structures.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kenen (1976, p. 20).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Whitman (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  38. See, however, World Bank (1985, p. 60) for estimates of the importance of foreign credit in total credits of a number of developing countries. See also Goldsmith (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  39. OECD (1982a, p.8).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cooper (1968), Mills (1976), Walter (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hawkins (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cf. Kuznets (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Goldsmith (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bloomfield (1968), World Bank (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  45. See Grubel (1979), Dunning (1981a).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Goldsmith (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid, p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Larsen, Llewellyn and Potter (1983, pp. 49–50).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., Hickman and Schleicher (1978), Fair (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Larsen, Llewellyn and Potter (1983, p. 68). This means, as the authors point out, that ‘the model’s properties could be inappropriate in simulation conditions approaching full capacity utilisation’ (ibid.).

    Google Scholar 

  51. See also Cline and Associates (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cf. Goldstein and Khan (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  54. The OECD model of financial ‘linkages’ and exchange rates is described in some detail in Holtham (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Larsen, Llewellyn and Potter (1983, p. 66).

    Google Scholar 

  56. This point is emphasised in Hickman and Schleicher (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Dr Milivoje Panić

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panić, M. (1988). International Economic Integration and Interdependence in the 1980s. In: National Management of the International Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07129-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics