Skip to main content
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

During the Labour periods of office 1964–70, the Maud Royal Commission in England and Wales, and its parallel, the Wheatley Commission in Scotland, on local government were appointed in 1966. After their report in 1969 it was during Edward Heath’s Conservative government in 1972 that the new Local Government Acts (the first in England and Wales since 1889) were passed, which adapted the Maud and Wheatley recommendations considerably, redrawing the lines in England and Wales from 141 county and county borough authorities to 54 county and metropolitan councils (including the Greater London Council), and over 1000 urban and rural district councils in England and Wales became 369 district councils. In the second half of the 1970s the new ruling councils set up local authorities and sought to exert their influence by testing political alignments within the newly-constituted areas and regions and sending reverberations through much of the public sector AFE, both by reshuffles in the permanent administration of the LEAs and in the appointments of elected members to important committees and governing bodies of the institutions. Comprehensive reorganisation which had been begun by Labour governments in the later 1960s had its most concentrated effects in the 1970s in England and Wales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Giles Radice, Labour spokesman on education, in a speech reported 1 May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For general and specific reference see P. Kellner and Lord Crowther-Hunt: The Civil Servants, London, 1980;

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Pliatsky: Getting and Spending, London, 1982;

    Google Scholar 

  4. See F. Layfield (chairman): Local Government Finance, Cmnd 6543, HMSO, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Trow: Problems of the Transition from Elite to Mass Education, Berkeley, 1975; M. Trow: Elite and Mass Education: American Models and European Realities, Stockholm, 1978; T. R. McConnell, R. O. Berdahl, Margaret A. Fay: From Elite to Mass to Universal Higher Education, Berkeley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Trow: Elite and Mass Education: American Models and European Realities, Stockholm, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. R. McConnell, R. O. Berdahl, Margaret A. Fay: From Elite to Mass to Universal Higher Education, Berkeley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. OECD (1971): Towards New Structures of Post Secondary Education, Paris, 1971;

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Halsey and M. Trow: The British Academics, London, 1971, p. 462.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. See also I. Hecquet, C. Verniers and L. Cerych: Recent Student Flows in Higher Education. OECD, Paris, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 W. A. C. Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, W.A.C. (1989). Interchapter 4. In: Higher Education in Postwar Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07064-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics