Skip to main content

Technical and Technological Education

  • Chapter
Higher Education in Postwar Britain
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

Weaver, in his lecture of 1973,1 offered a summary of the post-Robbins position facing the DES and the UGC in October 1963 as follows. In 1961–63 out of 216000 students beyond the age of 18 following full-time or sandwich courses in higher education 118 000 were in universities and 98000 in CATs and other technical colleges and training colleges; that represents 55 per cent in universities, and 45 per cent in the rest:. A similar aggregate of Robbins recommendations for 1980 proposed 560000 in all, with 350000 in universities and 145000 incorporated into university-based colleges of education according to the Robbins recommendations. The non-university institutions provided the remaining 65000 places and would take CNAA qualifications. Restated, this represents 88 per cent of the 560000 in the autonomous institutions and 12 per cent in the public establishments, together with a new Ministry of Arts and Science and a reshaped UGC. Ministers had already seen the typescript of the Robbins Report in August 1963 and when it was submitted in October the Tory government responded at once as we saw, accepting the proposals on student numbers for the next ten years and offering supporting finance until 1973. They accepted the Robbins principle of the eligibility of all persons qualified by ability and attainment and university status for the CATs, the establishment of the CNAA and the continued role of the UGC. However, by March 1964, six months later, they had had time to consider the rest of the proposals and rejected the Robbins recommendation for a separate Minister for Arts and Science, proposing instead a Secretary of State presiding over a new Department of Education and Science, to be in place on 1 April, and this has been the pattern ever since.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. Kogan (ed.): The Politics of Education, London, 1971, p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woolwich speech, April 1965. Copied J. Pratt and T. Burgess: Polytechnics: A Report, London, 1974, pp. 203–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. From much writing on the binary system and polytechnics the following are selected: J. Pratt and T. Burgess: Polytechnics: A Report, London, 1974;

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Donaldson: Policy and the Polytechnics, London, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Burgess and J. Pratt: Policy and Practice: The Colleges of Advanced Technology, London, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kogan (ed.): The Politics of Education, London, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. E. Regan: Local Government and Education, London, 1977, Chaps. IX and X

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Venables: Higher Education Developments: The Technological Universities, London, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. R. Niblett, D. W. Humphries, J. R. Fairhurst: The University Connection, London, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Robinson: The New Polytechnics, London, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Burgess and J. Pratt: Innovation in Higher Education: Technical Education in the United Kingdom, OECD, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. King, P. R. G. Layard, C. S. Moser: The Impact of Robbins, London, 1969

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 W. A. C. Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, W.A.C. (1989). Technical and Technological Education. In: Higher Education in Postwar Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07064-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics