Abstract
In this prophetic passage from Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville predicted the rise of the United States and Russia to the apex of the hierarchy of nation-states. What Tocqueville did not foresee was the emergence of two antithetical ideologies whose basic tenets involved ‘swaying the destinies of “the whole of” the globe’. Furthermore, Tocqueville did not foresee the creation of nuclear weapons, which would enable each superpower to hold the destiny of the other in its own hands. In this chapter, we will consider the consequences of US-Soviet rivalry when it first surfaced in the immediate post-war years (1947–53). More particularly, we shall explore the extent to which the US-Soviet ‘cold war’ was restrained or unrestrained. If we are to assess periods of d’tente, it is essential to contrast with them the period from which d’tente emerged.
There are, at the present time, two great nations in the world which seem to tend towards the same end, although they started from different points: I allude to the Russians and the Americans. Both of them have grown up unnoticed; and whilst the attention of mankind was directed elsewhere, they have suddenly assumed a most prominent place among nations …
Their starting point is different, and their courses are not the same; yet each of them seems to be marked by the will of Heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe.1
Alexis de Tocqueville
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America, 1835, tr. Henry Reeve (N.Y.: Colonial Press, 1899) vol. 1, pp. 441–2.
E. H. Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923, vol. iii (London: Macmillan, 1953) pp. 109–13.
Max Beloff, The Foreign Policy of Soviet Russia 1929–1941 vol. i (London: Oxford University Press, 1947) p. 117.
S. Brookhart, New York Times, 17 Nov. 1933.
Joseph Whelan, ‘The United States and Diplomatie Recognition: The Contrasting Cases of Russia and Communist China’, The China Quarterly, Jan.–Mar. 1961, no. 5, pp. 63–4.
Diane Shaver Clemens, Yalta (London: Oxford University Press, 1970) pp. 262–3.
A. W. DePorte, Europe Between the Superpowers (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979) p. 92.
Sir John Wheeler-Bennett and Anthony Nicholls, The Semblance of Peace (N.Y.: St Martin’s Press, 1972) p. 556.
Cominform statement regarding expulsion of Yugoslavia, 28 June 1948; Stephen Clissold, ed., Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union (London: Oxford University Press, 1975) pp. 202–7.
Herbert Butterfield, International Conflict in the Twentieth Century (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960) p. 77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1985 Richard W. Stevenson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stevenson, R.W. (1985). The Setting for Détente. In: The Rise and Fall of Détente. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07024-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07024-4_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-07026-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-07024-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)