Abstract
The work of building a new political society which could sustain liberal political institutions, by altering traditional political relationships and attitudes to political authority, had to proceed at various levels in India. While the seven political legacies that we examined in the last chapter provided a broad range of possible political conduct and choices available to the individual involved in India’s democratic politics, he or she still needed operational guidelines for the possible goals to be pursued and the manner of pursuing them. In other words, the broad examples of demonstrated political conduct set forth by the great leaders needed to be supplemented by an individual’s own shared notion of what was normatively desirable and what was politically possible, given his own level of understanding, interest and willingness to act politically. In this chapter we shall examine certain aspects of such a process of political learning and action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F. G. Bailey, Politics and Social Change: Orissa in 1959 (California University Press, 1963) p. 220.
See in this connection Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph, The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India (Chicago University Press, 1967) pp. 24–8.
M. K. Gandhi, “Last Will and Testament” in Pyrelal, Mahatma Gandhi, The Last Phase (Ahmedabad: Navjivan Press House, 1956) vol. II, pp. 819–20. This document was prepared by Gandhi a week before he was assassinated. In it he had expressed grave reservations over a national movement, like the Congress, converting itself into a party organisation. He was certain that men in it would abuse their position by using political office for personal gain.
M. K. Gandhi, Satyagraha (1910–1935) (Allahabad: All India Congress Committee, 1935) p. 2.
K. Santhanam, Satyagraha and the State (London: Asia Publishing House, 1960) with a preface by B. P. Sinha, the then Chief Justice of India.
Jayaprakash Narayan, Towards Total Revolution, edited and introduced by Brahmanand (Bombay: Popular Prakashan, 1978), JP’ preface vol. I, p. x (my italics).
Ghanshyam Shah, Protest Movements in Two Indian States: A Study of the Gujarat and Bihar Movements (Delhi: Ajanta Publications, 1977) p. viii.
To JP political resistance to authority, together with punishment for the breach of law, is a dimension that Mahatma Gandhi added to democracy. To Mahatma Gandhi as well as to JP, “the citizen has an inalienable right to civil disobedience”. See in this connection Jayprakash Narayan, “Testament of Protest”, Far Eastern Economic Review (20 Feb. 1976).
See in this connection Marcus Franda, Radical Politics in West Bengal (MIT Press, 1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 A. H. Somjee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Somjee, A.H. (1984). Normative—Pragmatic Considerations in Political Involvement: The Case of India. In: Political Society in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06898-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06898-2_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06900-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06898-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)