Skip to main content

Abstract

One of the fundamental insights that we owe to the work of Clower (1965) and Leijonhufvud (1968) is that the basic difference between the economics of the classics and the economics of Keynes lies in the assumptions made about the adjustment behaviour of the two systems: ‘in the short run, the “Classical” system adjusts to changes in money expenditures by means of price-level movements; the Keynesian adjusts primarily by way of real income movements’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 51). ‘In the Keynesian macrosystem the Marshallian ranking of price- and quantity adjustments speeds is reversed … The “revolutionary” element of the General Theory can perhaps not be stated in simpler terms’ (Leijonhufvud, 1968, p. 52).

The ideas of this chapter were first presented at the meeting of the Subcommittee for Economic Theory of the Verein für Socialpolitik, September 1978, in Hamburg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrow, R. J., and H. I. Grossman (1971) ‘A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment’, American Economic Review, 61: 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J. P. (1975) ‘Neo-Keynesian Disequilibrium Theory in a Monetary Economy’, Review of Economic Studies, XLII: 503–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J. P. (1976) ‘The Disequilibrium Approach to Monopolistic Price Setting and General Monopolistic Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, XLIII: 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, V. (1980) Preise, Löhne and Beschäftigung, Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1956) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clower, R. W. (1965) ‘The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal’ in F. M. Hahn and F. P. R. Brechling (eds), The Theory of Interest Rates, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, Allan (1980) ‘Recent Developments in Macroeconomic Disequilibrium Theory’, Econometrica, 48: 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. H. (1975) ‘Existence of an Exchange Equilibrium under Price Rigidities’, International Economic Review, 16: 301–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dréze, J. H. (1982) ‘Decision Criteria for Business Firms’, CORE Discussion paper no. 8211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont J. M and G. Laroque (1976) ‘On Temporary Keynesian Equilibria’, Review of Economic Studies, XLIII: 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. (1976) ‘Keynesian Economics and General Equilibrium Theory: Reflections on some Current Debates’, Stanford University, Economics series, Technical Report 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. (1978) ‘On Non-Walrasian Equilibria’, Review of Economic Studies, 45: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, K. and W. Hildenbrand (1978) ‘On Keynesian Equilibria with Unemployment and Quantity Rationing’, Journal of Economic Theory, 18: 255–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honkapohja, S., and T. Ito (1980) ‘Inventory Dynamics in a Simple Disequilibrium Macroeconomic Model’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 82: 184–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, R. (1980) ‘A Remark on Conjectural Equilibria’, CORE Discussion paper no. 8009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1939) ‘Speculation and Economic Stability’, Review of Economic Studies, 7: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (1968) On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1977) The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muellbauer, J., and R. Portes (1978) ‘Macroeconomic Models with Quantity Rationing’, Economic Journal, 88: 788–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. (1960) ‘Monopolistic Competition and General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 28: 196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondermann, D. (1974) ‘Temporary Competitive Equilibrium under Uncertainty’, in J. H. Dréze (ed.), Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, New York: Wiley, ch. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1954) Elements of Pure Economics, trans. W. Jaffé, Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman, E. C. (1974) ‘On the Unstable Behaviour of Stock Exchange’, Journal of Economic Theory, 1 (1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sondermann, D. (1985). Keynesian Unemployment as Non-Walrasian Equilibria. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06879-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics