Skip to main content

Modelling the Role of History in Industrial Organization and Competition

  • Chapter
Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare

Abstract

Our objective in this chapter is to describe some recent developments in the area of industrial organization pertaining to the role of history in industrial competition.

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful conversations with Drew Fudenberg. This paper was prepared while the first author was at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. We are grateful to the National Science Foundation for financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abreu, D. (1982) ‘Repeated Games with Discounting: A General Theory and an Application to Oligopoly’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A., and H. Demsetz (1972) ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, 62: 777–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1981) ‘The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists’, American Political Science Review, 75: 306–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. (1956) Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1982) ‘Learning, Estimation, and the Stability of Rational Expectations Equilibrium’, Journal of Economic Theory, 26: 318–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937) ‘The Nature of the Firm,’ Econometrica, 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R., and J. March (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and J. Stiglitz (1980) ‘Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of RandD’, Bell Journal of Economics, 11: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1979) ‘A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: pp. 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1980) ‘The Role of Investment in Entry Deterrence’, Economic Journal, 90: 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (1983) ‘Quality Control and Learning in Productive Systems’, PhD dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1977) Oligopoly and the Theory of Games, Amsterdam: North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Frideman, M. (1953) Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole (1982a) ‘Capital as a Commitment: Strategic Investment to Deter Mobility’ (mimeo), Journal of Economic Theory, 31: 227–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Tirole (1982b) ‘Learning by Doing and Market Performance’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Tirole (1983) ‘Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoptation of New Technology’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., R. Gilbert, J. Stiglitz and J. Tirole (1982) ‘Preemption, Leapfrogging and Competition in Patent Races’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., and R. Harris (1982) ‘Competition and Mergers with Lumpy Investment’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., and D. Newbery (1982) ‘Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly’, American Economic Review, 72: 514–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E., and R. Porter (1981) ‘Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Price Information’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., and J. Freeman (1977) ‘Population Ecology of Organizations’ American Journal of Sociology, 82: pp. 929–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1967–8) ‘Games with Incomplete Information Played by Bayesian Players’, Management Science, 14: 159–82, 320–34, 486–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1982) ‘Managerial Incentive Problems — A Dynamic Perspective’, in Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck, Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W. Meckling (1976) ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (1982) ‘A Note on Competitive Foresight and Optimum Product Diversity’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., and A. Tversky (1979) ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, Econometrica, 47: 263–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., and R. Wilson (1982) ‘Reputation and Imperfect Information,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 27: 253–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., P. Milgrom, J. Roberts and R. Wilson (1982) ‘Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma’, Journal of Economic Theory, 27: 245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. (1981) ‘Extrapolative Investment Equilibrium’, (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. (1982) ‘The Learning Curve, Pricing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Processing Industries,’ PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. (1979) ‘Market Structure and Innovation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93: 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, J., and R. Radner (1972) Economic Theory of Teams, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E., and J. Tirole (1982) ‘A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, I: Overview and Quantity Competition with Large Fixed Costs’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts (1982a) ‘Limit Pricing and Entry Under Incomplete Information’, Econometrica, 50: 443–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts (1982b) ‘Predation, Reputation and Entry Deterrence’, Journal of Economic Theory, 27: 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and A. Spence (1982) ‘The Capacity Expansion Process in a Growing Oligopoly: The Case of Corn Wet Milling’, in J. J. McCall (ed.), The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E., and M. Visscher (1977) ‘Sequential Location Among Firms with Foresight’, Bell Journal of Economics, 8: 378–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1972) ‘Existence of Equilibrium of Plans, Prices and Price Expectations in a Sequence of Markets,’ Econometrica, 40: 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1975) ‘A Behavioral Model of Cost Reduction’, Bell Journal of Economics, 8: 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1980) ‘Collusive Behavior in Noncooperative Epsilon-Equilibria in Oligopolies with Long but Finite Lives’, Journal of Economic Theory, 22: 136–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1981) ‘Optimal Equilibria in Some Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R., and D. Rutenberg (1979) ‘Preempting an Alert Rival: Strategic Timing of the First Plant by Analysis of Sophisticated Rivalry’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 412–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. (1981) ‘Dynamic Games of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Theory, 25: 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum J. (1982a) ‘A Dynamic Game of RandD: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior’ Econometrica, 50: 671–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. (1982b) ‘Patent Races with a Sequence of Innovations’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J., and N. Stokey (1981) ‘Oligopoly Extraction of a Nonrenewable, Common Property Resource: The Importance of the Period of Commitment in Dynamic Games’ (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and F. Schoumaker (1981) ‘Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study,’ American Economic Review, 73: 362–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1979) ‘Strong Perfect Equilibrium in Supergames’, International Journal of Game Theory, 9: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd edn, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1982) ‘Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands’, American Economic Review, 72: 349–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, A., and J. Sutton (1982) Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation’, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1965) Administrative Behaviour, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1978) ‘The Chain-store Paradox’, Theory and Decision, 9: 127–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, S. (1980) ‘The Prisoner’s Dilemma and Dynamical Systems Associated to Non-Cooperative Games’, Econometrica, 48: 1617–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. (1977) ‘Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing’, Bell Journal of Economics, 8: 534–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. (1979) ‘Investment Strategy and Growth in a New Market’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. (1981) ‘The Learning Curve and Competition’, Bell Journal of Economics, 12: 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. (1982) ‘Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance’ (mimeo), Econometrica, 52: 101–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1964) ‘A Theory of Oligopoly’, Journal of Political Economy, 72: 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylos-Labini, P. (1962) Oligopoly and Technical Progress, trans. E. Henderson, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1972) ‘Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice’, Psychological Review, 76: 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahnemann (1974) ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185: 1124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. (1981) ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attri- butes’, Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (December): 1537–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kreps, D.M., Spence, A.M. (1985). Modelling the Role of History in Industrial Organization and Competition. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06876-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics