Abstract
To persuade a third of your staff to invest in a unique experiment, the concept of which was entirely foreign to them, is a remarkable achievement of which NFC is justifiably proud. But every coin has two sides — and if a third of NFC’s employees invested it means that two-thirds did not. Applications for shares on Dealing Days by workers who did not subscribe initially show that some of them now wish that they had, but the figures show the proportion to be not very high, and the most likely motivation is the visibly successful performance of the shares in terms of dividends declared and increasing capital value since the offer. It is interesting to note, too, that on Dealing Days there is an overwhelming preponderance of those who took up shares initially wanting to add to their holding. The obvious question is: why the split?
Q. (SM). What would your reaction have been right at the beginning if your husband had come home from work one night and said he wanted to take out a second mortgage on the house to buy shares in his own company?
A. (Manager’s wife). Oh, but we did take out a second mortgage. It was my idea.
From a conversation at an NFC shareholders meeting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1983 National Freight Consortium p.l.c.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLachlan, S. (1983). How The Staff Reacted. In: The National Freight Buy-Out. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06850-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06850-0_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06852-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06850-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)