Skip to main content
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

From the sixteenth century onwards there has been no lack of critics writing in praise or dispraise of the English language either in general or on points of detail which happened to interest them. Some of the critics have been well-known men of letters, and such writers may choose to exert an influence by example rather than precept. Swift was one of the most vigorous of the reformers of English, but he has probably exerted more influence by the straightforward simplicity of his own style than by his fulminations against changes that he disliked. If a writer wishes to make more specific criticisms, he can do so by writing essays on linguistic matters or by including digressions in books on other subjects. Readers of novels have learnt to be tolerant of such digressions. Another channel for criticism is provided by characters in novels or plays who comment, usually with scorn, on the language used by others. There is a less direct form of criticism taking the form of the allocation of language which the author thinks foolish to foolish characters without any comment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See G. L. Brook, The Language of Dickens (Andre Deutsch, 1970) pp. 176–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. By Susie I. Tucker in English Examined: Two centuries of comment on the mother-tongue (CUP, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. F. Jones, The Triumph of the English Language (Stanford University Press, 1953) pp. 199 f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Essays of John Dryden, selected and edited by W. P. Ker (OUP, 1900) pp. 234 f.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Heron, Letters of Literature (1785) pp. 240–9. Quoted from

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel Defoe, ‘Of Academies’, An Essay upon Several Projects (1702), pp. 228 ff, quoted from Susie I. Tucker, English Examined, pp. 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jonathan Swift, A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue (1712), in Herbert Davis with Louis Landa (eds), The Prose Writings of Jonathan Swift (Blackwell, 1957) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reprinted in Giles Dugdale, William Barnes of Dorset (Cassell, 1953) appx 3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. W. Fowler, ‘Professor Jespersen and “the Instinctive Grammatical Moralizer” ’ in SPE Tract No. 26 (OUP, 1927) p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sir Ernest Gowers, Preface to the revised edition of A Dictionary of Modem English Usage (OUP, 1965) p. iii.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. Burchfield, The Fowlers: their Achievements in Lexicography and Grammar (English Association Presidential Address, 1979) p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. P. Herbert, What a Word! (Methuen, 1935) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boswell’s Life of Johnson, edited by George Birkbeck Hill, revised by L. F. Powell (OUP, 1934) vol. II, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 G. L. Brook

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brook, G.L. (1981). Reform. In: Words in Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06817-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics