Abstract
From the sixteenth century onwards there has been no lack of critics writing in praise or dispraise of the English language either in general or on points of detail which happened to interest them. Some of the critics have been well-known men of letters, and such writers may choose to exert an influence by example rather than precept. Swift was one of the most vigorous of the reformers of English, but he has probably exerted more influence by the straightforward simplicity of his own style than by his fulminations against changes that he disliked. If a writer wishes to make more specific criticisms, he can do so by writing essays on linguistic matters or by including digressions in books on other subjects. Readers of novels have learnt to be tolerant of such digressions. Another channel for criticism is provided by characters in novels or plays who comment, usually with scorn, on the language used by others. There is a less direct form of criticism taking the form of the allocation of language which the author thinks foolish to foolish characters without any comment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See G. L. Brook, The Language of Dickens (Andre Deutsch, 1970) pp. 176–9.
By Susie I. Tucker in English Examined: Two centuries of comment on the mother-tongue (CUP, 1961).
R. F. Jones, The Triumph of the English Language (Stanford University Press, 1953) pp. 199 f.
Essays of John Dryden, selected and edited by W. P. Ker (OUP, 1900) pp. 234 f.
Robert Heron, Letters of Literature (1785) pp. 240–9. Quoted from
Daniel Defoe, ‘Of Academies’, An Essay upon Several Projects (1702), pp. 228 ff, quoted from Susie I. Tucker, English Examined, pp. 58–60.
Jonathan Swift, A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue (1712), in Herbert Davis with Louis Landa (eds), The Prose Writings of Jonathan Swift (Blackwell, 1957) p. 14.
Reprinted in Giles Dugdale, William Barnes of Dorset (Cassell, 1953) appx 3.
H. W. Fowler, ‘Professor Jespersen and “the Instinctive Grammatical Moralizer” ’ in SPE Tract No. 26 (OUP, 1927) p. 194.
Sir Ernest Gowers, Preface to the revised edition of A Dictionary of Modem English Usage (OUP, 1965) p. iii.
R. W. Burchfield, The Fowlers: their Achievements in Lexicography and Grammar (English Association Presidential Address, 1979) p. 17.
A. P. Herbert, What a Word! (Methuen, 1935) p. 2.
Boswell’s Life of Johnson, edited by George Birkbeck Hill, revised by L. F. Powell (OUP, 1934) vol. II, p. 247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1981 G. L. Brook
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brook, G.L. (1981). Reform. In: Words in Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06817-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06817-3_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-35276-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06817-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)