Skip to main content

The Unity of Coleridge’s Critical Theory

  • Chapter
English Romanticism

Abstract

The remarkable fact about Coleridge the critic, often regarded as the father of modern criticism, is not that many of his ideas are so highly derivative as sometimes to amount to plagiarism, nor that his most famous critical work, Biographia Literaria, is also one of the most disorderly books ever to be published in English, nor even that parts of it are written in a style almost unreadable. (Byron compared him in the Dedication to Don Juan to a hunting hawk released for flight with his hood still upon him, ‘Explaining Metaphysics to the nation — / I wish he would explain his Explanation.’ For Shelley in Letter to Maria Gisborne Coleridge was a ‘hooded eagle’, his mind ‘with its own internal lightning blind’ [ll. 208, 205].) No, the miracle of Coleridge’s critical theory lies in the small number of his seminal ideas, the internal consistency of those ideas, the remarkable flexibility with which they may be restated in numerous and quite different contexts, the extent to which the theory may be translated into practical criticism of such a poet as Wordsworth, and the firm philosophical and psychological base upon which all this rests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. CCW, I, p. 392. For discussion of the scientific controversies out of which Coleridge’s ‘essay’ emerged, see Alice D. Snyder, Coleridge on Logic and Learning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1929) pp. 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valuable studies on Coleridge’s thought that take up several of the questions raised in this chapter include John H. Muirhead, Coleridge as Philosopher (1930);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas McFarland, Coleridge and the Pantheist Tradition (1969);

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Owen Barfield, What Coleridge Thought (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. CCL, I, p. 396. To George Coleridge, c. 10 March 1798. On Coleridge’s religious beliefs, see Charles Richard Sanders, Coleridge and the Broad Church Movement (1942);

    Google Scholar 

  6. James D. Boulger, Coleridge as Religious Thinker (1961);

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Robert Barth, S. J., Coleridge and Christian Doctrine (1969);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. David Pym, The Religious Thought of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1978);

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Stephen Prickett, Romanticism and Religion: The Tradition of Coleridge and Wordsworth in the Victorian Church (1976),

    Google Scholar 

  10. chs 1 and 2. E. S. Shaffer, ‘Kubla Khan’ and The Fall of Jerusalem: The Mythological School in Biblical Criticism and Secular Literature, 1770–1880 (1975) valuably supplements all of the above.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ‘On Poesy and Art’, Biographia, II, p. 258. For discussion of this idea in the Romantics and afterwards, see M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (1953; New York: W. W. Norton, 1958) pp. 21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The discussion here, as well as elsewhere in this chapter, is indebted to the brilliant tour de force that is Richard Harter Fogle’s The Idea of Coleridge’s Criticism (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: 1794–1804, ed. Kathleen Coburn, 2 vols (New York: Pantheon, 1957) part I (text), no. 1618. Entry of 26 October 1803.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 John Clubbe and the Estate of Ernest J. Lovell, Jr

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clubbe, J., Lovell, E.J. (1983). The Unity of Coleridge’s Critical Theory. In: English Romanticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06726-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics