Abstract
As everyone now knows, The Waste Land was drafted in 1921 during Eliot’s convalescence from some kind of nervous breakdown due to overwork, financial worries, tension with his family back in America, and the prolonged strains of his disastrous marriage. This list could probably be extended, but will not in itself explain why the crisis should have occurred precisely when it did. Casting around for precipitating causes, one comes upon the inescapable fact that Eliot’s collapse immediately followed his mother’s first and long-awaited visit to England. How deeply that visit was necessary to him is suggested by a letter to his brother in 1920 (WLF, p. xviii) where Eliot’s heavy, repeated stress on seeing the mother has the resonant quality of Hegelian recognition rather than denoting mere visual proximity. That aspiration, I shall argue below, will be denied in The Waste Land itself by the sea-change that turns Phlebas’s eyes to pearl. Details of Mrs Eliot’s visit in 1921 are not available, yet it is nevertheless clear that Eliot had radically underestimated his mother’s strength and vitality. Since she was seventy-seven years old, he anticipated that physical frailty would render her visit more an anxiety than a joy to him.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973) p. 107.
See Adorno’s The Philosophy of Modern Music (New York: Seabury Press, 1973).
Jackson, Fantasy, p. 15. See also F. N. Lees, ‘Mr Eliot’s Sunday Morning Satura: Petronius and The Waste Land’, in T. S. Eliot: The Man and his Work, ed. Allen Tate (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) pp. 343–52.
John Peter, ‘A New Interpretation of The Waste Land (1952)’, Essays in Criticism, no. 19 (1969) p. 143.
James Miller, T. S. Eliot’s Personal Waste Land: Exorcism of the Demons (London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1977) is a book-length version of the same argument.
Bernard Bergonzi, T. S. Eliot, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1978) p. 95.
August Strindberg, The Father, Miss Julie and The Ghost Sonata, trs. Michael Meyer (London: Eyre Methuen, 1976) p. 170. Subsequent references are included in the text.
Cited in George Steiner, After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation (Oxford University Press, 1975) p. 35.
Jacques Lacan, The Language of the Self The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis, trs. Anthony Wilden (New York: Dell, 1968) p. 31.
D. W. Harding, ‘What the Thunder Said’, in The Waste Land in Different Voices, ed. A. D. Moody (London: Edward Arnold, 1974) p. 25.
Graham Martin, ‘Language and Belief in T. S. Eliot’s Poetry’, in Eliot in Perspective, ed. Graham Martin (London: Macmillan, 1970) p. 117.
D. W. Harding, Experience into Words (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974) p. 121.
Aeschylus, Oresteia, trs. Robert Fagles (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977) p. 264.
André Green, The Tragic Effect: The Oedipus Complex in Tragedy, trs. Alan Sheridan (Cambridge University Press, 1979) pp. 55–6.
Sigmund Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, trs. James Strachey (London: Hogarth, 1974) p. 12.
T. S. Eliot, The Confidential Clerk: A Play (London: Faber, 1967) p. 118.
T. S. Eliot, The Elder Statesman (London: Faber, 1969) p. 32. Subsequent references are included in the text.
Copyright information
© 1984 Tony Pinkney
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinkney, T. (1984). Not Waving but Drowning: The Waste Land to Eliot’s Drama. In: Women in the Poetry of T. S. Eliot. Macmillan Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06666-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06666-7_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06668-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06666-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)