Skip to main content

Abstract

It should not be necessary to argue that the United States would play a crucial role in the success of any change in regimes governing North-South economic relations. As the world’s largest, politically integrated market, and as one of the most important markets for developing countries in particular, the acquiescence of the United States in any new norms, rules, and procedures is a must. The broader role of the United States in the international system, as leader of the Western bloc and guarantor of the majority of its international economic regimes, gives it certain distinctive features which, especially in light of the recent theories of hegemonic decline, justify a more detailed examination of its policies than has been given to those of other countries. One further reason for focusing on the United States is the lower than average consistency of its NIEO policies over time. In this chapter, four distinct phases of US policies toward the NIEO between 1974 and 1977 are identified. The purpose of the chapter is to isolate the domestic political factors which explain the oscillations in those policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Stephen Walker, ‘The Interface Between Beliefs and Behavior: Kissinger, His Operational Code and the Vietnam War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21 (1977) 129–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William D. Smith, ‘Two Oil Experts Say Major Long-Term Energy Problems Remain’, New York Times (22 March 1974) p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas O. Enders, ‘The Problem of Commodity Prices and Supply’, Department of State Bulletin (19 August 1974) pp. 300–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roger B. Porter, Presidential Decision-Making: The Economic Policy Board (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) pp. 39–54. Porter says that Simon and Seidman were equals on the Board. but the facts he reports suggest otherwise.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Official Records, A/PV.2327, pp. 4–12; Daniel P. Moynihan, A Dangerous Place (Boston: Little, Brown, 1978) ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. US House of Representative, Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Trade, Generalized Tariff Preferences (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  7. House Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, Subcommittee on International Trade, Investment and Monetary Policy, Hearings (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  8. House Committee on International Relations, Subcommittee on International Organizations. Issues at the Special Session of the 1975 UN General Assembly (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Catherine Gwin. ‘The Seventh Special Session: Toward a New Phase of Relations Between the Developed and the Developing States?’ in Karl Sauvant and H. Hasenpflug (eds), New International Economic Order (New York: Westview, 1977) pp. 108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See ‘Reservations by the United States to the Resolution of the Seventh Special Session of the United Nations’, by Jacob Myerson in US House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations, Report by Congressional Advisors to the Seventh Special Session of the United Nations (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. US Senate, Committee on Finance, Oversight Hearings on U.S. Foreign Trade Policy (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1976) p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen D. Cohen, The Making of United States International Economic Policy (New York: Praeger, 1977) p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., pp. 197–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Jere Behrman, International Commodity Agreements (Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council, 1977); and see the Beirat report, Notes to Chapter 5, note 12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Cooper, Karl Kaiser. and Masataka Kosaka, Towards a Renovated International System (New York: The Trilateral Commission, 1977) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Martin M. McLaughlin, ‘The United States in the North-South Dialogue: A Survey’, in The U.S. and World Development: Agenda 1979 (New York: Praeger, 1979) pp. 102–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Jeffrey A. Hart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hart, J.A. (1983). The United States. In: The New International Economic Order. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06594-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics