Skip to main content

Abstract

This book contains five essays on various aspects of German economic history from 1880 to 1979. There are three reasons why Germany, rather than another industrial country, was chosen for this study. First, the German economy was subject to larger shocks than most other industrial countries during the period under analysis. The largest shocks were the very great destruction caused by the two world wars and the ensuing territorial losses and the hyperinflation of 1919 to 1923. Thus German developments and their accurate measurement represented in some periods almost a controlled experiment and can therefore be considered as ideal to study and test economic theories. Because of the slow adjustment of the private sector to these shocks, the German economy experienced long periods of disequilibrium; therefore in building the models and in formulating the hypothesis to test, disequilibrium was introduced explicitly. The three-equation monthly model of inflation, exchange rate changes and money supply growth built to study the hyperinflation of the early 1920s (Chapter 3), the four-equation quarterly model to explain changes in nominal income before and during the great depression of 1929-33 (Chapter 4) and the sixteen-equation annual macroeconomic model estimated for one hundred years (Chapter 5), all rely heavily on Wymer’s (1972, 1976) and Bergstrom and Wymer’s (1976) work on the specification and estimation of disequilibrium growth models with neoclassical long-term properties. The dynamic properties of these three models are determined by the adjustment of actual quantities and prices to partial equilibrium levels. Lags are assumed to be related to transaction costs, uncertainty and, in general, all real-world frictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Among them should be mentioned: Statistisches Reichsamt (1925), Vergleichende Notenbankstatistik (1925), Caasen (1953), Hoffmann (1965) and Deutsche Bundesbank (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gottlieb (1957); Grotius (1949); Gurley (1953); Klopstock (1949); Mendershausen (1949); Moller (1976); Pesek (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Balassa (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. All estimates of the annual national accounts and balance of payments statistics for the two world wars and immediate postwar years are to be taken with great caution since they are generally based on relatively simple assumptions.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The channels through which the growth in government transfers, taxation and public debt since 1960 could have affected negatively private employment, capital accumulation and economic growth in the European Community are surveyed in Tullio (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Increases in government expenditure and taxation in relation to NNP in most European countries have been very similar to those recorded in Germany in the 1960s and the 1970s, while in the United States and Japan their growth has been much more moderate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Andrea Sommariva and Giuseppe Tullio

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sommariva, A., Tullio, G. (1987). Introduction. In: German Macroeconomic History, 1880–1979. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06591-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics