Skip to main content

Theatrical Spectacle

  • Chapter
The Tempest

Part of the book series: Text and Performance ((TEPE))

Abstract

Giorgio Strehler’s magician had a very different aim in mind. In the Milan production (1978) he was essentially a man of the theatre, and the Italian director employed his conjuring skills as a metaphor for the power of art in general and theatre in particular to change the world. This meant that Prospero’s objectives were seen in terms of stage effects which had a necessarily limited efficacity. The love of Ferdinand and Miranda did not elicit any undue surprise on the line ‘It works!’ Nor was Prospero thrown emotionally off-balance by the realisation that he had forgotten the conspiracy against him. Indeed, Strehler cut the celebratory masque, the more to emphasise the previous apparition of Ariel as the harpy: an interruption which by contrast is intended to have a profound effect on the spectators. This interpretation emphasised the autobiographical element in the play and minimised both the threats to Prospero and the necessity to act urgently. A production lasting — as this did — for four hours was little concerned with the magician’s temporal limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 David L. Hirst

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirst, D.L. (1984). Theatrical Spectacle. In: The Tempest. Text and Performance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06578-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics