The Beilis Case: Anti-Semitism and Politics in the Reign of Nicholas II

  • Hans Rogger
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

The Beilis Case — a charge of ritual murder brought against an obscure Jewish clerk in July 1911 and tried before a Kiev jury in September 1913 — has more than once been called Russia’s Dreyfus Affair).1 As a shorthand summary, the comparison serves well enough. In both instances an innocent nonentity was plucked out of obscurity to become the object of a contest whose larger implications, while they agitated politics and opinion, escaped the victim or left him indifferent. Beyond this, points of difference loom larger than similarities.

Keywords

Dementia Bacillus Assure Tria Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    For example, by R. Charques, The Twilight of Imperial Russia (London: 1958) p. 194.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. S. Tager, Tsarskaia Rossiia i delo Beilisa (Moscow: 1933; 2nd edn, Moscow: 1934); English translation: The Decay of Czarism. The Beilis Trial (Phialdclphia: 1935). References are to the first Russian edition. Google Scholar
  3. M. Samuel’s Blood Accusation (New York: 1966) appeared after the completion of the present article. In his assessment of the-motives for staging the trial, Samuel follows Tager.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    G. V. Barandov, Stolypinskaia reaktsiia (Moscow: 1938) pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    L. H. Haimson, ‘The Problem of Social Stability in Urban Russia, 1905–1917’, SR, 23, no. 4(1964) pp. 624–7.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    G. B. Sliozberg, Dela minuvshikh dnei (Paris: 1933) 3, pp. 312–13;Google Scholar
  7. G. A. Hosking, The Russian Constitutional Experiment (Cambridge: 1973) p. 207.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. W. Simmonds, ‘The Congress of Representatives of the Nobles’ Associations, 1906–1916’, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University (1964) pp. 162, 172, 220;Google Scholar
  9. G. A. Hosking and R. T. Manning, ‘What Was the United Nobility’, in L. H. Haimson (ed.) The Politics of Rural Russia (Bloomington, Indiana: 1979) pp. 142–83.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    E. Chmielewski, ‘Stolypin’s Last Crisis’, CSS, 3 (1904) pp. 95–126; Novyi voskhod, no. 18(15 May 1911) p. 3.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Kievlianin, 24 October 1913; R. Edelman, Cientry Politics on the five of the Revolution (New Brunswick, New Jersey: 1980) pp. 187–8.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    V. A. Maklakov, ‘Spasitel’noe predostorezhenie: smysl dela Beilisa’, Russkaia mysf, no. 11 (1913) pp. 139–41;Google Scholar
  13. S. I. Elpat′evskii, Vospominaniia za 50 let (Leningrad: 1929) pp. 366–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quoted in N. V. Krylenko, Sudebynye rechi (Moscow: 1964) p. 44.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. E. Shchegolev (ed.) Padenie tsarskogo rezhima (Moscow-Leningrad: 1924–7) p. 104.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid, p. 359.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ibid, p. 368.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    J. Masè. Memoirs (in Hebrew) (Tel-Aviv: 1936) 2. pp. 65–6.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Sliozberg, Dela. 3, pp. 36–7; I. V. Gessen. V dvukh vekakh (Berlin: 1937; Arkhiv russkoi revoliutsii. vol. XXI) pp. 303–5.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    A. I. Spiridovich. Les dernières annees de la cour de Tsarskoie-Sélo (Paris: 1928) 2, p. 447.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    M. Kilcoyne, ‘The Political Influence of Rasputin’, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington (1961);Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    Spiridovich, LCS dernières années, 2, p. 472; F. Seraphim, Russische Porträts (Vienna: 1943) 1, pp. 120–1; Hosking, Russian Constitutional Experiment, p. 201. On Meshcherskii: W. F. Mosse, Imperial Favourite.Google Scholar
  23. V. P. Meshchersky and “Grazhdanin”’, STFR. 59, no. 4 (1981) pp. 529–47.Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    Baron, The Russian Jew, pp. 75–6; Sliozberg, Dela, 2, p. 93; A. V.- GerassimofT (Gerasimov), Der Kampf gegen die erste russische Revolution (Frauenfeld und Leipzig: 1934) p. 146; Urusov, Zapiski, pp. 12–13; Seraphim, Porträts, 1, pp. 97–8 and ‘Zar Nikolaus II und Graf Witte’, Historische Zeitschrift, 161, no. 2 (1940) p. 285;Google Scholar
  25. H. Rollin, L’Apocalypse de not re temps (Paris: 1940) p. 13; Germany, Auswärtiges Amt, Akten, film scries I, reel 306, nos 318 and 207, 19 June 1903 and 22 October 1913.Google Scholar
  26. 38.
    O. O. Gruzenberg, Ocherki i rechi (New York: 1944) p. 207;Google Scholar
  27. V. Klimov, Raspravy i razstrely (Moscow: 1906) p. 30;Google Scholar
  28. E. I. Kozlynina, Za polveka(1862–1912) (Moscow: 1913) p. 526;Google Scholar
  29. A. Margolin, The Jews of Eastern Europe (New York: 1926) pp. 216–17; Sliozberg, Dela, 3, p. 79; Elpat′evskii, Vospominaniia, p. 371.Google Scholar
  30. 40.
    V. V. Rozanov, Oboniatefnoe i osiazatetnoe otnoshenie evreev k krovi (St Petersburg: 1914) p. viii.Google Scholar
  31. 41.
    Letter to N. V. Pleve, 1 November 1913, in V. P. Viktorov (ed.) and A. Chernovskii (comp.) Soiuz russkogo naroda (Moscow-Leningrad: 1929) pp. 162–3.Google Scholar
  32. 42.
    Letter to Skvortsov, cited bv V. A. Maevskii, Revoliutsioner-monarkhist (Novi Sad: 1934) pp. 71–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hans Rogger 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Rogger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations