Abstract
The Beilis Case — a charge of ritual murder brought against an obscure Jewish clerk in July 1911 and tried before a Kiev jury in September 1913 — has more than once been called Russia’s Dreyfus Affair).1 As a shorthand summary, the comparison serves well enough. In both instances an innocent nonentity was plucked out of obscurity to become the object of a contest whose larger implications, while they agitated politics and opinion, escaped the victim or left him indifferent. Beyond this, points of difference loom larger than similarities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For example, by R. Charques, The Twilight of Imperial Russia (London: 1958) p. 194.
A. S. Tager, Tsarskaia Rossiia i delo Beilisa (Moscow: 1933; 2nd edn, Moscow: 1934); English translation: The Decay of Czarism. The Beilis Trial (Phialdclphia: 1935). References are to the first Russian edition.
M. Samuel’s Blood Accusation (New York: 1966) appeared after the completion of the present article. In his assessment of the-motives for staging the trial, Samuel follows Tager.
G. V. Barandov, Stolypinskaia reaktsiia (Moscow: 1938) pp. 36–7.
L. H. Haimson, ‘The Problem of Social Stability in Urban Russia, 1905–1917’, SR, 23, no. 4(1964) pp. 624–7.
G. B. Sliozberg, Dela minuvshikh dnei (Paris: 1933) 3, pp. 312–13;
G. A. Hosking, The Russian Constitutional Experiment (Cambridge: 1973) p. 207.
G. W. Simmonds, ‘The Congress of Representatives of the Nobles’ Associations, 1906–1916’, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University (1964) pp. 162, 172, 220;
G. A. Hosking and R. T. Manning, ‘What Was the United Nobility’, in L. H. Haimson (ed.) The Politics of Rural Russia (Bloomington, Indiana: 1979) pp. 142–83.
E. Chmielewski, ‘Stolypin’s Last Crisis’, CSS, 3 (1904) pp. 95–126; Novyi voskhod, no. 18(15 May 1911) p. 3.
Kievlianin, 24 October 1913; R. Edelman, Cientry Politics on the five of the Revolution (New Brunswick, New Jersey: 1980) pp. 187–8.
V. A. Maklakov, ‘Spasitel’noe predostorezhenie: smysl dela Beilisa’, Russkaia mysf, no. 11 (1913) pp. 139–41;
S. I. Elpat′evskii, Vospominaniia za 50 let (Leningrad: 1929) pp. 366–7.
Quoted in N. V. Krylenko, Sudebynye rechi (Moscow: 1964) p. 44.
P. E. Shchegolev (ed.) Padenie tsarskogo rezhima (Moscow-Leningrad: 1924–7) p. 104.
Ibid, p. 359.
Ibid, p. 368.
J. Masè. Memoirs (in Hebrew) (Tel-Aviv: 1936) 2. pp. 65–6.
Sliozberg, Dela. 3, pp. 36–7; I. V. Gessen. V dvukh vekakh (Berlin: 1937; Arkhiv russkoi revoliutsii. vol. XXI) pp. 303–5.
A. I. Spiridovich. Les dernières annees de la cour de Tsarskoie-Sélo (Paris: 1928) 2, p. 447.
M. Kilcoyne, ‘The Political Influence of Rasputin’, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington (1961);
Spiridovich, LCS dernières années, 2, p. 472; F. Seraphim, Russische Porträts (Vienna: 1943) 1, pp. 120–1; Hosking, Russian Constitutional Experiment, p. 201. On Meshcherskii: W. F. Mosse, Imperial Favourite.
V. P. Meshchersky and “Grazhdanin”’, STFR. 59, no. 4 (1981) pp. 529–47.
Baron, The Russian Jew, pp. 75–6; Sliozberg, Dela, 2, p. 93; A. V.- GerassimofT (Gerasimov), Der Kampf gegen die erste russische Revolution (Frauenfeld und Leipzig: 1934) p. 146; Urusov, Zapiski, pp. 12–13; Seraphim, Porträts, 1, pp. 97–8 and ‘Zar Nikolaus II und Graf Witte’, Historische Zeitschrift, 161, no. 2 (1940) p. 285;
H. Rollin, L’Apocalypse de not re temps (Paris: 1940) p. 13; Germany, Auswärtiges Amt, Akten, film scries I, reel 306, nos 318 and 207, 19 June 1903 and 22 October 1913.
O. O. Gruzenberg, Ocherki i rechi (New York: 1944) p. 207;
V. Klimov, Raspravy i razstrely (Moscow: 1906) p. 30;
E. I. Kozlynina, Za polveka(1862–1912) (Moscow: 1913) p. 526;
A. Margolin, The Jews of Eastern Europe (New York: 1926) pp. 216–17; Sliozberg, Dela, 3, p. 79; Elpat′evskii, Vospominaniia, p. 371.
V. V. Rozanov, Oboniatefnoe i osiazatetnoe otnoshenie evreev k krovi (St Petersburg: 1914) p. viii.
Letter to N. V. Pleve, 1 November 1913, in V. P. Viktorov (ed.) and A. Chernovskii (comp.) Soiuz russkogo naroda (Moscow-Leningrad: 1929) pp. 162–3.
Letter to Skvortsov, cited bv V. A. Maevskii, Revoliutsioner-monarkhist (Novi Sad: 1934) pp. 71–2.
Copyright information
© 1986 Hans Rogger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rogger, H. (1986). The Beilis Case: Anti-Semitism and Politics in the Reign of Nicholas II. In: Jewish Policies and Right-Wing Politics in Imperial Russia. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06568-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06568-4_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06570-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06568-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)