Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic and Social History ((SESH))

  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

SINCE completing this work in 1968 three things of note have occurred. The first is that the retail price index, which then stood at 48.4 (1975 = 100), stands in January 1982 at 230.4. In fourteen years we have suffered as much inflation as was experienced in the sixteenth century as a whole. The second development of note was that in 1968 the star of ‘monetarism’, in economic theory at least, was then again ascending1 and it continued to gleam brightly thereafter. Disbelief in its explanatory value made me cautious about accepting monetary explanations of the whole Tudor price rise, however, and this caution has been justified by subsequent events. The third development of note is that a number of works have appeared that shed light on the price and monetary history of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and the publishers have kindly permitted me to add this brief note drawing attention to some of these new publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnote

  1. Propelled curiously by Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz’s empirical study, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960 (Princeton, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Trevethick, Inflation (Harmondsworth, 2nd ed., 1980) is an excellent short guide to the modern experience ofinflation and the conflicting theories it has spawned.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Blanchard, ‘Population Change, Enclosure, and the Early Tudor Economy’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, XXIII (1970), 427–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Hatcher, Plague, Population and the English Economy1318–1530 (London, 1977), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Doughty, ‘Industrial Prices and Inflation in Southern England, 1401–1640’, Explorations in Economic History, 12 (1975), 177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See R. B. Outhwaite, ‘Review of Periodical Literature … 1975’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, XXX (1977), 217–21, for some cautionary remarks.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. E. Challis’s criticisms of Gould’s book in his ‘Currency and the Economy in mid-Tudor England’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, XXV (1972), 313–22 should be read in conjunction with Gould’s important but neglected replies: J. D. Gould, ‘The Great Debasement and the Supply of Money’, Australian Economic History Review, XIII (1973), 177–89, and ‘Currency and Exchange Rate in Sixteenth-Century England’, Journal of European Economic History, II (1973), 149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Smeaton (ed.), Essays of Francis Bacon (London, 1906), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield, The Population History of England 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (London, 1981), p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1969 The Economic History Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Outhwaite, R.B. (1969). Postscript. In: Inflation in Tudor and Early Stuart England. Studies in Economic and Social History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06565-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics