Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

Is regulation of clinical research necessary at all? Some regulation probably is necessary and should have three aims. The first is the obvious one of ensuring so far as possible the safety of the volunteers or patients. The second, which is not quite so obvious and does not always receive the same attention, is to maximise the scientific returns from the research, to make sure the hypotheses being tested are the important ones and that the methods used to test them are the best available. The third is the most powerful reason for the first two; since the subjects of research are from the general population and the money for research comes from the taxpayers, it is essential that citizens should be convinced that safety and good standards of scientific work are being observed. That is why regulation takes place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Hugh L’etang

Copyright information

© 1983 The Royal Society of Medicine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dollery, C.T. (1983). How Much Regulation is Desirable in Clinical Practice?. In: L’etang, H. (eds) Regulation and Restraint in Contemporary Medicine in the UK and USA. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06501-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics