Abstract
Is regulation of clinical research necessary at all? Some regulation probably is necessary and should have three aims. The first is the obvious one of ensuring so far as possible the safety of the volunteers or patients. The second, which is not quite so obvious and does not always receive the same attention, is to maximise the scientific returns from the research, to make sure the hypotheses being tested are the important ones and that the methods used to test them are the best available. The third is the most powerful reason for the first two; since the subjects of research are from the general population and the money for research comes from the taxpayers, it is essential that citizens should be convinced that safety and good standards of scientific work are being observed. That is why regulation takes place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1983 The Royal Society of Medicine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dollery, C.T. (1983). How Much Regulation is Desirable in Clinical Practice?. In: L’etang, H. (eds) Regulation and Restraint in Contemporary Medicine in the UK and USA. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06501-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06501-1_18
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06503-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06501-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)