Abstract
Social work has always been considered an essentially humane and compassionate occupation, but as stress envelops its practitioners we have become increasingly incapable of relating even to each other. Personal expression is limited or distorted by statute and hierarchy; the writing of reports is more important and time-consuming than the encounters which supply their content. The feelings which Richard Titmuss once described as creative altruism, and which many thought were the mainspring of social work, have become subjected to an incessant process of covering oneself against mishap. An area officer in my department was recently heard to remark that if the paperwork is all right, everything is all right. I have already surveyed many of the factors which have created such turmoil but it is worth reiterating the dimension for which social workers have themselves been largely responsible, the consistent splitting of individuals from the groups of which they are constituents. On one hand we divorce ourselves from routine administration and continually castigate allegedly unfeeling bureaucrats, whether in local government or in the D. H. S. S.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
See Zofia Butrym, The Nature of Social Work (London: Macmillan, 1976), and Bill Jordan, Poor Parents (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974); also Jordan, Freedom and the Welfare State (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976).
Butrym, The Nature of Social Work, p. 150.
M. Simpkin, ‘Clients in the Community’ in R. Jenkins, M. Aldridge and R. Thorpe (eds). Working in the Community, Social Work Studies no. 1 (University of Nottingham, 1975).
J. Mayer and N. Timms, The Client Speaks (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970).
Bob Deacon, Case Con 17, Autumn 1974, p. 31.
Home Office Research Unit, Workloads in Children’s Departments (London: H. M. S. O., 1969).
J. Benington, Local Government Becomes Big Business (Coventry: Community Development Project Occasional Paper no. 11, 1975).
P. Corrigan and P. Leonard, Social Work Practice under Capitalism (London: Macmillan, 1978) p. 45.
H. Braverman, Labour and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).
A. Macintyre, A Short History of Ethics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967).
Best read in H. J. Paton, The Moral Law (London: Hutchinson, 1966).
B. Rodgers and J. Dixon, A Portrait of Social Work (Oxford University Press, 1960), quoted by P. Halmos, The Faith of the Counsellors (London: Constable, 1965) p. 149.
C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves (London: Fontana, 1963) p. 121. 16. Butrym, The Nature of Social Work, ch. 3.
R. Pinker, Social Theory and Social Policy (London: Heinemann, 1971) p. 151.
Tom Hart, A Walk with Alan (London: Quartet, 1973).
Halmos, The Faith of the Counsellors, p. 189.
Jordan, Freedom and the Welfare State, p. 166.
Hart, A Walk with Alan.
Halmos, The Faith of the Counsellors, p. 189.
Quoted by Ernst Fischer, Marx in his Own Words (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).
P. Aries, Centuries of Childhood (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973) p. 393.
Quoted by E. Zaretsky, Capitalism, the Family and Personal Life (London: Pluto Press, 1976). See also S. Rowbotham, Woman’s Consciousness, Man’s World (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).
E. Fromm, The Art of Loving (London: Allen and Unwin, 1970).
1. Mészáros, Marx’s Theory of Alienation (London: Merlin Press, 1972) p. 269.
Pinker. Social Theory and Social Policy, p. 170.
Butrym, The Nature of Social Work, p. 119.
Quoted by H. F. Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious (London: Allen Lane, 1970) p. 190.
Copyright information
© 1983 Mike Simpkin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simpkin, M. (1983). The lament for caring. In: Trapped within Welfare. Titles in the Crisis Points Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06449-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06449-6_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-33956-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06449-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)