Abstract
The laudable aim of The Humane Research Trust trust is to promote humane medical and scientific research. Although many persons are totally opposed to the use of animals in what they describe as vivisection, a term of considerable ambiguity, most people recognise that some experimental use of animals is both necessary and justified in the pursuit of useful biological knowledge interpreted in a broad sense to include not only medical knowledge of benefit to man but knowledge which is acquired for the benefit and preservation of endangered species and the treatment of animals generally. Kindly disposed people are naturally concerned with the degree of pain and stress that might be engendered in such pursuits, however well intentioned, and on this topic I shall be elaborating later. In this paper I should like to accomplish three things: to review briefly events leading up to the present attitude towards animals especially in the field of scientific research, to discuss current legislative control in Britain of such research, and thirdly to indicate what improvements might be made in any future legislation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hill, A. V. (1929) Experiments on frogs and men, in: “The Ethical Dilemma of Science” (A.V. Hill) Rockefeller Institute Press in association with the Oxford University Press, (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 The Contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vine, R.S. (1983). Legislating against cruelty. In: Turner, P. (eds) Animals in Scientific Research: An Effective Substitute for Man?. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06439-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06439-7_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06441-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06439-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)