Abstract
Research on human medicine suffers from the difficulties of finding animal models of the numerous ailments, to which man is subject. Such models must be sought in man himself or in domestic or laboratory animals. Man, himself, is not available, except to a very limited extent for experimentation, and the domestic and laboratory animals in common use are far from satisfactory, because they are phylogenetically too far removed from man and respond differently to the agents of pathogenesis. For this reason, non-human primates have been extensively used in recent years. Their use is for many reasons repugnant, but such problems as that of poliomyelitis could not have been resolved in other ways. Whatever their value in some lines of research, they too do not provide satisfactory models, because their natural disease patterns in wild conditions do not in any way resemble those of man.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 The Contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiennes, R.N.TW. (1983). Comparative medicine. In: Turner, P. (eds) Animals in Scientific Research: An Effective Substitute for Man?. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06439-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06439-7_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06441-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06439-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)