Abstract
Immediately after the Second World War much of the machinery manufactured in the UK was ‘traditional’, and the manufacturers had no strong commitment to technical development. A Board of Trade working party recorded in 1946:
… in the last ten years textile machinery makers in other countries … have been spending money on research and development on a scale immensely greater than anything attempted in this country. (Cotton Industry Working Party, 1946)
This chapter draws heavily on information collected in an earlier and longer study (Rothwell, 1976).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cotton Industry Working Party Report (London: HMSO, 1946).
Committee of Investigation into the Cotton Textile Machinery Industry, Report (the Evershed Report) (London: HMSO, 1947).
Department of Trade and Industry, Report on the Census of Production: Textile Machinery, 1963 and 1973 (London: HMSO, 1968 and 1977).
Department of Industry, information supplied to the author (1977).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Commodity Trade Statistics series C (Paris: published annually)
Office of Technology Assessment and Forecast, Technology Assessment and Forecast, Third Report, US Department of Commerce (Washington DC: USGPO, 1974).
R. Rothwell, ‘British Northrop: A Case of Decline and Renaissance’, Textile Institute and Industry (Nov. 1975).
R. Rothwell, Innovation in Textile Machinery: Some Significant Factors in Success and Failure, Occasional Paper no. 2, Science Policy Research Unit (University of Sussex: SPRU, 1976a).
R. Rothwell, ‘Picanol Weefautomaten: A Case Study of a Successful Machine Builder’, Textile Institute and Industry (Mar. 1976b).
R. Rothwell, ‘Innovation in Textile Machinery: The Results of a Postal Questionnaire Survey’, R & D Management, vol. 6, no. 3 (June 1976c).
R. Rothwell, ‘Technological Innovation in Textile Machinery: The Role of Radical and Incremental Technical Change’, Textile Institute and Industry (Nov. 1976d).
R. Rothwell, ‘Users’ and Producers ‘Perceptions of the Relative Importance of Various Textile Machinery Characteristics’, Textile Institute and Industry (July 1977a).
R. Rothwell, ‘Innovation in Textile Machinery: The Czechoslovak Experience’, Textile Institute and Industry (Dec. 1977b).
R. Rothwell, ‘Some Problems of Technology Transfer into Industry: Examples from the Textile Machinery Sector’, IEEE Transacting on Engineering Management (Feb. 1978).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1980 Science Policy Research Unit
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rothwell, R. (1980). Innovation in Textile Machinery. In: Pavitt, K. (eds) Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06381-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06381-9_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-33381-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06381-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)