Abstract
Keynes has often been associated with a contemptuous view of mathematical economics. After all, it was he who wrote (Keynes, 1936, pp. 297–8):
It is a great fault of symbolic pseudo-mathematical methods of formalising a system of economic analysis, such as we shall set down in section VI of this chapter that they expressly assume strict independence between the factors involved and lose all their cogency and authority if this hypothesis is disallowed; whereas in ordinary discourse, where we are not blindly manipulating but know all the time what we are doing and what the words mean, we can keep ‘at the back of our heads’ the necessary reserves and qualifications and the adjustments we shall have to make later on, in a way in which we cannot keep complicated partial differentials ‘at the back’ of several pages of algebra which assume that they all vanish.
It is not my purpose to dissect this passage although it strikes me as contrary to general experience. No one I think is worse than the truly non-mathematical economist at holding at the back of his head the fact of his particular assumptions, or indeed of doing anything about them later on. However, everyone would agree that there is no substitute for flair and there can be little doubt that Keynes’s words were particularly directed at Professor Pigou, of whose mathematical economics, flair was not a notable feature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bellman, R. E. (1957) Dynamic Programming (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Foldes, L. (1978) ‘Optimal Saving and Risk in Continuous Time’, Review of Economic Studies, 45, 1, 39–66.
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan).
Mirrlees, J. A. (1974) ‘Optimal Growth under Uncertainty’, in J. Dreze (ed.) Allocation under Uncertainty (London: Macmillan) 36–52.
Ramsey, F. P. (1928) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Saving’, Economic Journal, 38. 543–59.
Vickrey, W. (1967) ‘Economic Criteria for Optimal Rate of Depletion’, in M. Gaffney (ed.) Extractive Resources and Taxation (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press) 315–30.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 A. Ingham and A. M. Ulph
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bliss, C. (1984). Notes on the Keynes-Ramsey Rule. In: Ingham, A., Ulph, A.M. (eds) Demand, Equilibrium and Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06358-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06358-1_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06360-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06358-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)