Abstract
It is a familiar point that investment in dwellings is encouraged, relative to other investment, by the nonimputation for tax purposes of the rental of owner-occupied dwellings. The possible source of bias in favour of residential investment indicated by Feldstein is entirely separate from this. It arises because inflation affects differently the tax liability on the return from the two different types of investment, on two accounts: the allowance made for inflation in measuring depreciation and inventory costs for corporate tax is incomplete; and the personal tax rate may not be the same as the corporate tax rate. In practice, Feldstein suggests, the first of these is the one that matters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 The Scandinavian Journal of Economics
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthews, R.C.O. (1983). Comment on M. Feldstein, “Inflation, Tax Rules and the Accumulation of Residential and Nonresidential Capital”. In: Calmfors, L. (eds) Long-Run Effects of Short-Run Stabilization Policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06349-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06349-9_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06351-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06349-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)