Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Changes in Productivity

  • Chapter

Abstract

Productivity measures the use of economic resources and is, therefore, a major index of economic welfare for individuals and the nation. The rate of productivity growth over the long run determines economic growth and makes possible improvements in living conditions and the attainment of national objectives. A slow growth economy will have difficulty reconciling society’s desire for general economic progress and resolving domestic and international problems; slow growth will therefore cause internal political and social problems, because improvements for some groups must come at the expense of losses for others. The decomposition of society into competing groups attempting to improve their relative positions when the nation as a whole loses (as with OPEC price increases), can escalate inflationary pressures, further shrinking national wealth. Thus, our national prestige, competitiveness, security, and welfare depend heavily on the level and growth of productivity.

I gratefully acknowledge Jerry Mark and his colleagues at the Bureau of I-abor Statistics and Nancy Barrett and Peggy Connerton of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Evaluation and Research lor their help with this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrett, N. S., ‘Productivity Impact of the Housework Shift’, US Department of Labor, ASPER (May 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Irving, ‘How to Put QWL to Work’, speech to Work in America Institute (6 December 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. and Dunlop, J. T., Labor and the American Community (Harvard University, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown C. and Medoff, J., ‘Trade Unions in the Production Process’, Journal of Political Economy (January 1978) pp. 355–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinloy, R., ‘Sources of Quality Change in Labor Input’, American Economic Review (March 1980) pp. 108–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., ‘Unions and Productivity in the Cement Industry’, Harvard University, unpublished dissertation (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connerton, M., Freeman, R., and Medoff, J., ‘Productivity and Industrial Relations: The Case of U. S. Bituminous Coal’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper (December 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F., Accounting for Slower Economic Growth: The United States in the 197os (Brookings Institution, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F., ‘Effects of Selected Changes in the Institutional and Human Environment Upon Output per Unit Input’, Survey of Current Business (January 1978) pp. 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. F., ‘Explanations of Declining Productivity Growth’, The Survey of Current Business (August 1979) pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks-Mason, S., ‘The Effects of the OHSA Vinyl Chloride Standard on the Vinyl Chloride Industry’, US Department of Labor, OSHA Policy Office (August 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollop, F. M., and Jorgenson, D. W., U. S. Economic Growth: 1948–1973. Draft of forthcoming book, Economics Department, Harvard University (October 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., ‘R and D and the Productivity Slowdown’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 434 (January 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., ‘Research Expenditures and Growth Accounting’, in Williams, B. R. (ed.), Science and Technology in Economic Growth (London: International Economic Association, 1973) pp. 55–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, E. A. and Jorgenson, D. W., ‘Energy Prices and the U. S. Economy, 1972–1976’, Data Resources U. S. Review (September 1978) pp. 1.24–1.37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J. W., ‘Total Investment and Productivity Developments’, paper prepared for the Joint Session of the American Finance Association and the American Economic Association, New York (30 December 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J. W., ‘Productivity Trends and the Recent Slowdown’, in W. Fellner (ed.), Contemporary Economic Problems (American Enterprise Institute, 1979) pp. 12–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutscher, R. E., Mark, J. A. and Norsworthy, J. R., ‘The Productivity Slowdown and the Outlook to 1985’, Monthly Labor Review (May 1977) pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. III, ‘Rewards Systems in Improving Life at Work’, in Hackman, J. R., and Suttle, J. L. (eds), Goodyear Publication Company (1977) pp. 204–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, K., ‘Productivity Improvement: The Role of R and D and Capital Investment Policies’, Committee for Economic Development (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T., ‘Altering the Social Structure in Coal Mining: A Case Study’, Monthly Labor Review (October 1976) pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norsworthy, J. R., Harper, M. J. and Kunze, K., ‘The Slowdown in Productivity Growth: Analysis of Some Contributing Factors’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1979) pp. 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, G. L., ‘Potential Output: Recent Issues and Present Trends’, in Center for the Study of American Business, U. S. Productive Capacity: Estimating the Utilization Gap, Working Paper 23 (1977) pp. 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, S., Healy, J. and Livernash, R. E., The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terleckyj, N. E., Effects of R and D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study (Washington: National Planning Association, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C., The Zero-Sum Society (New York Basic Books, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor, Cotton Dust: Review of Alternative Technical Standards and Control Technologies, Report to the US Congress (May 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, ‘How to Counter Alienation in the Plant’, Harvard Business Review (November-December 1972) pp. 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 Charles P. Kindleberger and Guido di Tella

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marshall, R.M. (1982). Factors Influencing Changes in Productivity. In: Kindleberger, C.P., di Tella, G. (eds) Economics in the Long View. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06293-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics