Abstract
This comment is a revised version of an earlier one delivered at The City University’s conference on ‘Monetarism in the UK’, London, September 1981. The approach here is unconventional in treating the first and final drafts of Bade’s and Parkin’s (B & P) work as two separate papers, as the final draft included substantial changes and appeared more than a year later.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cross, R. (1982) ‘The Duheim-Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories of Macroeconomics’, Economic Journal, June 1982.
Cuddington, John T. (1981) ‘Money income and causality in the United Kingdom: an empirical re-examination’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, XIII, no. 3 (August): 342–51.
Parkin, Michael (1981), ‘Discriminating between natural and unnatural rate theories of macroeconomics’, mimeo, University of Western Ontario and MacQuarie University Centre for Studies in Money, Banking and Finance Working Paper 8102.
Parkin, M and Bade, (1982) Modern Macroeconomics (Oxford: Philip Allan).
Sims, C. A. (1972) ‘Money, income and causality’. American Economic Review, 62 (September): 540–52.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1984 Brian Griffiths and Geoffrey E. Wood
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Res, Z. (1984). Comment on Bade and Parkin’s Paper on Issues Concerning Monetary Policy in the UK. In: Griffiths, B., Wood, G.E. (eds) Monetarism in the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06284-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06284-3_19
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06286-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06284-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)