Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic and Social History ((SESH))

  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

THE ‘open-economy’ model accepted by British policy-makers and businessmen for most of the colonial period assumed that growth and development in Tropical Africa would be achieved through trade with the world in general, and with Britain in particular, in a complementary exchange of primary products against manufactures. Such a relationship would not necessarily preclude the emergence of some modern manufacturing industry in Africa, as had indeed occurred in India before 1914, but any industrialisation would have to come about spontaneously, as a result of market forces exploiting conditions of comparative advantage, and should not be ‘artificially’ induced by the state. Such a policy, it has been argued by nationalist writers from Hamilton and List to present-day dependency theorists [74] merely served to maintain the gap between the less developed and the more developed economy, and the reliance of one on the other. ‘Deindustrialisation’, in the form of a decline of handicraft industries, would proceed further and faster than the growth of new factory-based manufacturing and industrial employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 The Economic History Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munro, J.F. (1984). Crafts, Industry and Employment. In: Britain in Tropical Africa, 1880–1960. Studies in Economic and Social History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06172-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics