Skip to main content

Nuclear Proliferation in the 1980s: Perceptions and Proposals

  • Chapter
Book cover Nuclear Proliferation in the 1980s
  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

The explosion of a ‘peaceful nuclear device’ by India on 18 May 1974, must be considered a watershed in the perception of the nonproliferation issue: If the problem appeared to be a difficult but manageable one before the Rajasthan test the general assumption after the Indian step was that things were threatening to go out of control. Ever since, it has been feared that the dam could definitely break and the world would be confronted by a rapidly growing number of nuclear weapon states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Hsin Ping, ‘Utilization of Nuclear Energy and the Struggle Against Hegemony’, Peking Review, no. 15 (14 April 1978), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph S. Nye, ‘Non-proliferation: A Long-Term Strategy’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 56, no. 3 (April 1978), pp. 603–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gloria Duffy, ‘Soviet Nuclear Exports’, International Security, vol. 3, no. 1 (Summer 1978), pp. 84–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pierre Lellouche, ‘Frankreich im internationalen Disput über die Kernenergie’, Europa-Archiv, no. 17 (1978) pp. 541–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an interesting, though quite polemical, account of the German—South African relationship in the nuclear field, see Zdenek Cervenka and Barbara Rogers, The Nuclear Axis (London: Julian Friedmann, 1978) p. 464.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stanley Hoffmann, ‘The Hell of Good Intentions’, Foreign Policy, no. 29 (Winter 1977–8).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ted Greenwood, et al., Nuclear Proliferation, Motives, Capabilities, and Strategies for Control (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977) pp. 125–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christoph Bertram ‘Proliferation Oversell’, New York Times, 28 January 1977, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yair Evron, ‘Israel and the Atom. The Uses and Misuses of Ambiguity, 1957–1967’, Orbis, vol. xvu, no. 4 (Winter 1974) pp. 1326–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salzburg Seminar in American Studies, Session 186. Report by Prof. Porter’s Seminar Group (mimeographed) (September 1978) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard K. Betts ‘Paranoids, Pygmies, Pariahs and Non-proliferation’, Foreign Policy, no. 26 (Spring 1977) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 William H. Kincade and Christoph Bertram

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winkler, T. (1982). Nuclear Proliferation in the 1980s: Perceptions and Proposals. In: Kincade, W.H., Bertram, C. (eds) Nuclear Proliferation in the 1980s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06163-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics