The Historical Context: Changing Social Relations of Production in Jamaica

  • Guy Standing
Part of the ILO Studies book series

Abstract

The legacy of Jamaica’s history has been an underdeveloped economy characterised by its openness and persistent dependence on the world market and on foreign capital. Socially and politically the schisms between and within class groupings are deep, bitter, and longstanding. As every Jamaican is well aware it is a country effectively founded on slavery, and there are many who claim present ills stem almost exclusively from the conditions surrounding that slavery. However, in the twentieth century those ills are more meaningfully traced to the expansion of commercial and industrial capital, for after a protracted period of transition the capitalist mode of production became dominant and for long controlled the direction and nature of state policies.

Keywords

Sugar Income Cane Tate Wharf 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    C. G. Clarke: Kingston, Jamaica: Urban Development and Social Change, 1692–1962 (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1975), p. 54.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.A. Lewis: “The industrialisation of the British West Indies”, Caribbean Economic Review, Vol. 2, May 1950, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    Jamaica: Second Five Year Plan (Kingston, Government Printer, 1968), Vol. 11, p. 12.Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    O.A.S.: Report of the Mission in Jamaica on Employment Generating Projects (Washington DC, 1974).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Manufacturing production was concentrated on sophisticated consumer durables. N. Girvan: Foreign Capital and Economic Underdevelopment in Jamaica (Mona, ISER, 1971). Also on the weak linkages in the economy, see R. Girling: “Education, technology and development/under development”, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 1.
    W.A. Lewis: “Closing remarks” in W. Baer and I. Kerstenetsky (eds.): Inflation and Growth in Latin America (Homewood, Irwin, 1964), p. 27. Elsewhere Lewis attributed the associated rise in the reserve price of labour to envy.Google Scholar
  7. W.A. Lewis: Development Planning (London, Allen and Unwin, 1966), p. 77.Google Scholar
  8. 2.
    Jamaican Institute of Management: Preliminary Survey of Jamaican Management Manpower (Kingston, J.I.M., 1969).Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    O. Jefferson: The Post-War Economic Development of Jamaica (Mona, ISER, 1972), pp. 52–54. Personal income distribution was recorded as unchanged between 1958 and 1969.Google Scholar
  10. UN: Social Policy and Income Distribution in Jamaica (New York, United Nations, unpublished, 1970). The study of income distribution in 1958 showed severe inequality.Google Scholar
  11. E. Ahiram: “Income distribution in Jamaica, 1958”, Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, September 1965, pp. 333–69.Google Scholar
  12. 1.
    G. Eisner: Jamaica, 1830–1930: A Study in Economic Growth (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1961), p. 192.Google Scholar
  13. 1.
    One observer writing in 1861 noted, “Jamaican labour is essentially of this transient and uncertain character. It is not the negro’s fault; very few estates can afford to keep up a large and constant agricultural force”. W.G. Sewell: The Ordeal of Free Labour in the British West Indies, 1861 (New York, 1968 edition), p. 264.Google Scholar
  14. 2.
    G.E. Cumper: “Labour demand and supply in the Jamaican sugar industry, 1830–1950”, Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, March 1954, p. 61.Google Scholar
  15. It is hard to disagree with the view that “low wages strengthen the tendency for the participation in the labour market to be of a temporary nature, which in turn accounts for the persistently unskilled character of the labour force”. G. Arrighi: “Multinational corporations, labour aristocracy and economic development in tropical Africa”, in G. Arrighi and J. Saul: Essays on the Political Economy of Africa (New York, Monthly Review Press, 1973), p. 120.Google Scholar
  16. 1.
    W.L. Mathieson: The Sugar Colonies and Governor Eyre, 1849–1866 (London, Longmans, 1936), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  17. 2.
    H. Paget: “The free village system in Jamaica”, The Jamaican Historical Review, Vol. 1, No.1, 1945, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar
  18. 1.
    G. Beckford: Persistent Poverty (New York, Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  19. 2.
    IBRD: Current Economic Situation and Prospects of Jamaica (Washington, DC, March 1976), p. 10.Google Scholar
  20. Government of Jamaica: Five-Year Independence Plan, 1968–73 (Kingston, Government Printer, 1968), p. 17.Google Scholar
  21. Department of Statistics: Census of Agriculture, 1968–69: Preliminary Report (Kingston, October 1970).Google Scholar
  22. 1.
    One study found that the soil erosion was due to a lack of knowledge but was partly attributable to the system of land tenure, being greater on rented than on owned land. J.N. Blaut, R.P. Blaut, N. Harman and M. Moesman: “A study of cultural determinants of soil erosion and conservation in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica”, Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, December 1959, pp. 403–20.Google Scholar
  23. 1.
    G.E. Cumper: “Labour and development in the West Indies, Part I”, Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 1961, pp. 278–305.Google Scholar
  24. 2.
    L. Comitas: “Occupational multiplicity in rural Jamaica”, in V. Garfield and E. Friedl (eds.): Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society, 1963 (Seattle, 1964), pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
  25. 3.
    M.G. Smith: A Report on Labour Supply in Rural Jamaica (Kingston, Government Printer, 1956), p. 17.Google Scholar
  26. 1.
    R.B. Davison: Labour Shortage and Productivity in the Jamaican Sugar Industry (Mona, ISER, 1966), p. 37.Google Scholar
  27. 2.
    O. Patterson: “Social aspects of the sugar industry”, New World Quarterly, Vol. 5, Nos. 1 and 2, 1969, p. 48.Google Scholar
  28. 1.
    G. St. J. Orde-Brown: Labour Conditions in the West Indies (Cmd. 6070, London, HMSO, July 1939), para. 52, p. 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Labour Organisation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Standing

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations